Kamalinia Sanaz, Josse Robert G, Donio Patrick J, Leduc Lindsay, Shah Baiju R, Tobe Sheldon W
Institute of Medical Sciences University of Toronto Toronto ON Canada.
St. Michael's Hospital Toronto ON Canada.
Endocrinol Diabetes Metab. 2019 Nov 13;3(1):e00100. doi: 10.1002/edm2.100. eCollection 2020 Jan.
For patients with type 2 diabetes, newer antihyperglycaemic agents (AHA), including the dipeptidyl peptidase IV inhibitors (DPP4i), glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP1RA) and sodium glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) offer a lower risk of hypoglycaemia relative to sulfonylurea or insulin. However, it is not clear how AHA compare to placebo on risk of any hypoglycaemia. This study evaluates the risk of any and severe hypoglycaemia with AHA and metformin relative to placebo.
A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted of randomized, placebo-controlled trials ≥12 weeks in duration. MEDLINE, Embase and the Cochrane Library were searched up to April 16, 2019. Studies allowing use of other diabetes medications were excluded. Mantel-Haenszel risk ratio with 95% confidence intervals were used to pool estimates based on class of AHA and number of concomitant therapies used.
Eligible studies enrolled patients with type 2 diabetes ≥18 years of age.
144 studies met our inclusion criteria. Any hypoglycaemia was not increased with AHA when used as monotherapy (DPP4i (RR 1.12; 95% CI 0.81-1.56), GLP1RA (1.77; 0.91-3.46), SGLT2i (1.34; 0.83-2.15)), or as add-on to metformin (DPP4i (0.95; 0.67-1.35), GLP1RA (1.24; 0.80-1.91), SGLT2i (1.29; 0.91-1.83)) or as triple therapy (1.13; 0.67-1.91). However, metformin monotherapy (1.73; 1.02-2.94) and dual therapy initiation (3.56; 1.79-7.10) was associated with an increased risk of any hypoglycaemia. Severe hypoglycaemia was rare not increased for any comparisons.
Metformin and the simultaneous initiation of dual therapy, but not AHA used alone or as single add-on combination therapy, was associated with an increased risk of any hypoglycaemia relative to placebo.
对于2型糖尿病患者,新型抗高血糖药物(AHA),包括二肽基肽酶IV抑制剂(DPP4i)、胰高血糖素样肽-1受体激动剂(GLP1RA)和钠-葡萄糖协同转运蛋白2抑制剂(SGLT2i),相对于磺脲类药物或胰岛素,低血糖风险更低。然而,尚不清楚AHA与安慰剂相比在任何低血糖风险方面的情况。本研究评估了AHA和二甲双胍相对于安慰剂发生任何低血糖和严重低血糖的风险。
对持续时间≥12周的随机、安慰剂对照试验进行系统评价和荟萃分析。检索了截至2019年4月16日的MEDLINE、Embase和Cochrane图书馆。排除允许使用其他糖尿病药物的研究。采用Mantel-Haenszel风险比及95%置信区间,根据AHA类别和使用的联合治疗数量汇总估计值。
符合条件的研究纳入年龄≥18岁的2型糖尿病患者。
144项研究符合我们的纳入标准。AHA作为单药治疗(DPP4i(风险比1.12;95%置信区间0.81 - 1.56),GLP1RA(1.77;0.91 - 3.46),SGLT2i(1.34;0.83 - 2.15))、作为二甲双胍的附加治疗(DPP4i(0.95;0.67 - 1.35),GLP1RA(1.24;0.80 - 1.91),SGLT2i(1.29;0.91 - 1.83))或三联治疗(1.13;0.67 - 1.91)时,任何低血糖均未增加。然而,二甲双胍单药治疗(1.73;1.02 - 2.94)和起始双联治疗(3.56;1.79 - 7.10)与任何低血糖风险增加相关。严重低血糖罕见,任何比较中均未增加。
相对于安慰剂,二甲双胍和同时起始双联治疗,但不是单独使用AHA或作为单一附加联合治疗,与任何低血糖风险增加相关。