Hoffman M S, Villa A, Roberts W S, Fiorica J V, LaPolla J P, Barton D P, Cavanagh D
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, University of South Florida College of Medicine, Tampa 33682-0179.
J Reprod Med. 1991 May;36(5):356-8.
There has been a resurgence of interest recently in the optimal method of closure of the midline abdominal wound. The focus has been on the high-risk patient in particular. The controversy centers on interrupted versus continuous fascial closure and the choice of suture material. For three years on a gynecologic cancer service, running mass closure with delayed absorbable suture (Polyglactin) was used. Two hundred fifty-six patients were evaluable for analysis. The minimum follow-up time was two years. There was no wound dehiscence. Fourteen patients (5.5%) developed incisional hernias. The mass closure technique using delayed absorbable suture was effective in very-high-risk patients.
最近,人们对腹部中线伤口的最佳缝合方法重新产生了兴趣。尤其关注高危患者。争议集中在间断缝合与连续筋膜缝合以及缝合材料的选择上。在妇科癌症治疗服务中,连续使用延迟可吸收缝线(聚乙醇酸)进行缝合三年。256例患者可纳入分析。最短随访时间为两年。没有伤口裂开情况。14例患者(5.5%)发生了切口疝。使用延迟可吸收缝线的连续缝合技术对极高危患者有效。