Suppr超能文献

自发药物不良反应报告与事件监测:一项比较

Spontaneous adverse drug reaction reporting vs event monitoring: a comparison.

作者信息

Fletcher A P

机构信息

Post Marketing Surveillance Unit, IMS International Ltd, London.

出版信息

J R Soc Med. 1991 Jun;84(6):341-4. doi: 10.1177/014107689108400612.

Abstract

Spontaneous adverse drug reaction (ADR) reporting is the mainstay of national and international drug safety evaluation in the post-approval phase. A major criticism of the method has been a high, but essentially unquantifiable, level of under-reporting by doctors. A direct comparison has been made between spontaneous ADR reporting and an observational event monitoring system for a group of more than 44,000 patients receiving one or other of a group of seven new drugs. The data suggests that under-reporting by the spontaneous system may be as high as 98% for several clinical events believed to be associated with drug treatment.

摘要

自发药物不良反应(ADR)报告是药品批准后阶段国家和国际药品安全性评估的主要手段。该方法的一个主要批评意见是医生上报率很高,但基本上无法量化。针对一组超过44000名正在接受七种新药中一种或另一种治疗的患者,对自发ADR报告与观察性事件监测系统进行了直接比较。数据表明,对于一些被认为与药物治疗相关的临床事件,自发报告系统的漏报率可能高达98%。

相似文献

4
Patients' role in reporting adverse drug reactions.患者在报告药物不良反应中的作用。
Expert Opin Drug Saf. 2004 Jul;3(4):363-8. doi: 10.1517/14740338.3.4.363.
5
Outliers and patients with adverse drug reactions.异常值与药物不良反应患者。
Drug Saf. 2009;32(8):623-4. doi: 10.2165/00002018-200932080-00001.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

1
Voluntary systems of adverse reaction reporting--Part I.
Adverse Drug React Acute Poisoning Rev. 1985 Winter;4(4):213-30.
2
Voluntary systems of adverse reaction reporting--Part II.
Adverse Drug React Acute Poisoning Rev. 1986 Spring;5(1):23-55.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验