Cobert M L, Peltz M, West L M, Jessen M E
Department of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas 75390-8879, USA.
Transplant Proc. 2010 Jun;42(5):1591-4. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2010.02.073.
Machine perfusion preservation has been used experimentally to extend the storage interval of donor hearts. We previously demonstrated that machine perfusion with glucose-supplemented Celsior preservation solution led to superior reperfusion function but resulted in increased myocardial edema compared with conventional static preservation. We hypothesized that other solutions that contain an oncotic agent, such as University of Wisconsin Machine Perfusion Solution (UWMPS), might reduce graft edema development while maintaining myocardial oxidative metabolism during long-term storage.
Canine hearts were stored and perfused in a perfusion preservation device (LifeCradle; Organ Transport Systems) after cardioplegic arrest and donor cardiectomy. Hearts were perfused either with glucose-supplemented Celsior (which lacks an oncotic agent) or UWMPS (which contains hydroxyethyl starch) at 5 degrees C in the perfusion device over 10 hours. Oxygen consumption (MVO(2)), lactate accumulation, regional flow distribution, and myocardial water content were measured.
Hearts in both groups continued to extract oxygen over the entire perfusion interval. Lactate accumulation was minimal in both groups. Both solutions delivered perfusate evenly to all regions of myocardium. Heart weight increase (Celsior 31.3 +/- 4.3%, UWMPS -3.3 +/- 1.9%) and final myocardial water content (Celsior 80.2 +/- 1.3%, UWMPS 75.9 +/- 0.3%) were higher in the Celsior group (P < .005).
Donor hearts can be supported by a perfusion device over relatively extended storage intervals. These organs continue to undergo oxidative metabolism with little lactate accumulation. An oncotic agent appears to be important in limiting increases in myocardial water content. UWMPS appears to be superior for perfusion preservation of myocardium by reducing edema development during storage.
机器灌注保存已被用于实验性地延长供心的保存时间。我们之前证明,与传统静态保存相比,用补充葡萄糖的赛而斯(Celsior)保存液进行机器灌注可带来更好的再灌注功能,但会导致心肌水肿增加。我们推测,其他含有渗透剂的溶液,如威斯康星大学机器灌注液(UWMPS),可能会减少移植物水肿的发生,同时在长期保存期间维持心肌氧化代谢。
犬心在心脏停搏和供体心脏切除后,在灌注保存装置(LifeCradle;器官运输系统)中进行保存和灌注。心脏在灌注装置中于5℃下用补充葡萄糖的赛而斯(缺乏渗透剂)或UWMPS(含有羟乙基淀粉)灌注10小时。测量氧耗(MVO₂)、乳酸积累、区域血流分布和心肌含水量。
两组心脏在整个灌注期间都持续摄取氧气。两组的乳酸积累都很少。两种溶液都能将灌注液均匀地输送到心肌的所有区域。赛而斯组的心脏重量增加(赛而斯组为31.3±4.3%,UWMPS组为-3.3±1.9%)和最终心肌含水量(赛而斯组为80.2±1.3%,UWMPS组为75.9±0.3%)更高(P<0.005)。
供心可通过灌注装置在相对较长的保存时间内得到支持。这些器官继续进行氧化代谢,乳酸积累很少。渗透剂似乎对限制心肌含水量的增加很重要。UWMPS似乎在减少保存期间水肿形成方面对心肌灌注保存更具优势。