Center for Aphasia and Related Disorders, VA Northern California Health Care System, Martinez, CA 94553, USA.
Cortex. 2012 Feb;48(2):242-54. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2010.06.001. Epub 2010 Jun 16.
Recent work has been mixed with respect to the notion of embodied semantics, which suggests that processing linguistic stimuli referring to motor-related concepts recruits the same sensorimotor regions of cortex involved in the execution and observation of motor acts or the objects associated with those acts. In this study, we asked whether lesions to key sensorimotor regions would preferentially impact the comprehension of stimuli associated with the use of the hand, mouth or foot. Twenty-seven patients with left-hemisphere strokes and 10 age- and education-matched controls were presented with pictures and words representing objects and actions typically associated with the use of the hand, mouth, foot or no body part at all (i.e., neutral). Picture/sound pairs were presented simultaneously, and participants were required to press a space bar only when the item pairs matched (i.e., congruent trials). We conducted two different analyses: 1) we compared task performance of patients with and without lesions in several key areas previously implicated in the putative human mirror neuron system (i.e., Brodmann areas 4/6, 1/2/3, 21 and 44/45), and 2) we conducted Voxel-based Lesion-Symptom Mapping analyses (VLSM; Bates et al., 2003) to identify additional regions associated with the processing of effector-related versus neutral stimuli. Processing of effector-related stimuli was associated with several regions across the left hemisphere, and not solely with premotor/motor or somatosensory regions. We also did not find support for a somatotopically-organized distribution of effector-specific regions. We suggest that, rather than following the strict interpretation of homuncular somatotopy for embodied semantics, these findings support theories proposing the presence of a greater motor-language network which is associated with, but not restricted to, the network responsible for action execution and observation.
最近的研究结果在具身语义学的概念上存在差异,该概念表明,处理与运动相关概念相关的语言刺激会激活参与运动行为执行和观察或与这些行为相关的物体的相同感觉运动皮层区域。在这项研究中,我们想知道关键感觉运动区域的损伤是否会优先影响与手部、口腔或脚部使用相关的刺激的理解。我们对 27 名左半球中风患者和 10 名年龄和教育程度匹配的对照组进行了测试,他们看到了代表手部、口腔、脚部或完全没有身体部位(即中性)使用的物体和动作的图片和文字。图片/声音对同时呈现,参与者只有在物品对匹配(即一致试验)时才需要按空格键。我们进行了两项不同的分析:1)我们比较了在几个先前被认为与假设的人类镜像神经元系统有关的关键区域(即布罗德曼区 4/6、1/2/3、21 和 44/45)有或无损伤的患者的任务表现,2)我们进行了基于体素的损伤-症状映射分析(VLSM;Bates 等人,2003),以确定与处理效应器相关与中性刺激相关的其他区域。效应器相关刺激的处理与左半球的几个区域有关,而不仅仅与运动前/运动或躯体感觉区域有关。我们也没有发现支持效应器特异性区域具有躯体定位分布的证据。我们认为,这些发现支持了存在更大的运动语言网络的理论,而不是遵循具身语义学的严格的同源体躯体定位解释,该网络与负责执行和观察运动的网络有关,但不限于该网络。