Universita di Parma, Italy.
Cogn Neuropsychol. 2005 May;22(3):455-79. doi: 10.1080/02643290442000310.
Concepts are the elementary units of reason and linguistic meaning. They are conventional and relatively stable. As such, they must somehow be the result of neural activity in the brain. The questions are: Where? and How? A common philosophical position is that all concepts-even concepts about action and perception-are symbolic and abstract, and therefore must be implemented outside the brain's sensory-motor system. We will argue against this position using (1) neuroscientific evidence; (2) results from neural computation; and (3) results about the nature of concepts from cognitive linguistics. We will propose that the sensory-motor system has the right kind of structure to characterise both sensory-motor and more abstract concepts. Central to this picture are the neural theory of language and the theory of cogs, according to which, brain structures in the sensory-motor regions are exploited to characterise the so-called "abstract" concepts that constitute the meanings of grammatical constructions and general inference patterns.
概念是推理和语言意义的基本单位。它们是约定俗成的,相对稳定的。因此,它们必须是大脑神经活动的某种结果。问题是:在哪里?如何?一种常见的哲学观点是,所有的概念——甚至是关于行动和感知的概念——都是符号和抽象的,因此必须在大脑的感觉运动系统之外实现。我们将使用(1)神经科学证据;(2)神经计算的结果;(3)认知语言学关于概念本质的结果来反对这一立场。我们将提出,感觉运动系统具有合适的结构来描述感觉运动和更抽象的概念。这个观点的核心是语言的神经理论和 cogs 理论,根据该理论,感觉运动区域的大脑结构被用来描述所谓的“抽象”概念,这些概念构成了语法结构和一般推理模式的意义。