Department of Pathobiology, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
J Breath Res. 2008 Sep;2(3):37027. doi: 10.1088/1752-7155/2/3/037027.
Exhaled NO (FE(NO)) measurements have been utilized as a marker to diagnose asthma as well as a non-invasive tool for monitoring airway inflammation and the response to anti-inflammatory medications. One area where this non-invasive monitoring may be helpful is for asthmatic athletes as they train for competitive events. We hypothesized that in the course of training an asthmatic individual may experience worsening of lung inflammation reflected in FE(NO) levels that may be too subtle to detect by conventional methods like spirometry. Data were collected from an asthmatic patient (n = 1) over the course of endurance training using both the desktop (NIOX) and the portable NO (MINO) analyzers daily for eight weeks. We found that average NO levels measured in the desktop system correlated well with the two portable analyzers (r(2) =0.73, r(2) = 0.74 p < 0.0001); additionally, there was a strong correlation between the two MINO devices (r(2) = 0.88; p < 0.0001). A strong negative relationship existed between the number of miles run and NO, regardless of the device used. FEV(1) and PEF, however, did not change significantly as the miles run increased. Exercise training in asthmatics was associated with a decrease (improvement) in NO levels but no significant change in FEV(1) and PEF. This suggests that exhaled NO levels may be more sensitive to changes in the airway as a result of exercise than traditional pulmonary function testing.
呼出气一氧化氮(FE(NO))测量已被用作诊断哮喘的标志物,也是监测气道炎症和对抗炎药物反应的非侵入性工具。这种非侵入性监测在哮喘运动员的训练中可能会有所帮助,因为他们要为竞技赛事进行训练。我们假设,在训练过程中,哮喘患者的肺部炎症可能会恶化,这反映在 FE(NO)水平上,但这些变化可能太细微,常规的肺功能测试(如肺活量测定法)无法检测到。我们对一名哮喘患者(n=1)进行了为期 8 周的耐力训练,在此期间使用桌面(NIOX)和便携式(MINO)NO 分析仪每天采集数据。我们发现,桌面系统测量的平均 NO 水平与两种便携式分析仪相关性良好(r²=0.73,r²=0.74,p<0.0001);此外,两种 MINO 设备之间也存在很强的相关性(r²=0.88;p<0.0001)。无论使用哪种设备,跑步英里数与 NO 之间都存在强烈的负相关关系。然而,FEV(1)和 PEF 随着跑步英里数的增加并没有显著变化。哮喘患者的运动训练与 NO 水平的降低(改善)相关,但 FEV(1)和 PEF 没有明显变化。这表明,与传统的肺功能测试相比,呼出气一氧化氮水平可能对运动引起的气道变化更为敏感。