Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2300 RC, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Int Orthop. 2011 Jun;35(6):845-50. doi: 10.1007/s00264-010-1082-9. Epub 2010 Jul 11.
Rotation of the femoral component in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is of high importance in respect of the balancing of the knee and the patellofemoral joint. Though it is shown that computer assisted surgery (CAOS) improves the anteroposterior (AP) alignment in TKA, it is still unknown whether navigation helps in finding the accurate rotation or even improving rotation. Therefore the aim of our study was to evaluate the postoperative femoral component rotation on computed tomography (CT) with the intraoperative data of the navigation system. In 20 navigated TKAs the difference between the intraoperative stored rotation data of the femoral component and the postoperative rotation on CT was measured using the condylar twist angle (CTA). This is the angle between the epicondylar axis and the posterior condylar axis. Statistical analysis consisted of the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Bland-Altman plot. The mean intraoperative rotation CTA based on CAOS was 3.5° (range 2.4-8.6°). The postoperative CT scan showed a mean CTA of 4.0° (1.7-7.2). The ICC between the two observers was 0.81, and within observers this was 0.84 and 0.82, respectively. However, the ICC of the CAOS CTA versus the postoperative CT CTA was only 0.38. Though CAOS is being used for optimising the position of a TKA, this study shows that the (virtual) individual rotational position of the femoral component using a CAOS system is significantly different from the position on a postoperative CT scan.
在全膝关节置换术 (TKA) 中,股骨部件的旋转对于膝关节和髌股关节的平衡非常重要。尽管已经表明计算机辅助手术 (CAOS) 可以改善 TKA 的前后 (AP) 对齐,但仍不清楚导航是否有助于找到准确的旋转,甚至是否有助于改善旋转。因此,我们的研究目的是评估术中导航系统的术后股骨组件旋转在计算机断层扫描 (CT) 上的表现。在 20 例导航 TKA 中,使用髁间扭转角 (CTA) 测量股骨组件术中存储的旋转数据与术后 CT 上的旋转数据之间的差异。这是髁上轴和后髁轴之间的角度。统计分析包括组内相关系数 (ICC) 和 Bland-Altman 图。基于 CAOS 的术中平均旋转 CTA 为 3.5°(范围为 2.4-8.6°)。术后 CT 扫描显示平均 CTA 为 4.0°(1.7-7.2)。两位观察者之间的 ICC 为 0.81,观察者内 ICC 分别为 0.84 和 0.82。然而,CAOS CTA 与术后 CT CTA 的 ICC 仅为 0.38。尽管 CAOS 用于优化 TKA 的位置,但本研究表明,CAOS 系统中(虚拟)个体股骨组件的旋转位置与术后 CT 扫描上的位置明显不同。