• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

起始点放置技术对胸椎横突强度的影响:一项体外生物力学研究。

The effect of starting point placement technique on thoracic transverse process strength: an ex vivo biomechanical study.

作者信息

Brown Barrett S, McIff Terence E, Glattes Rudolph C, Burton Douglas C, Asher Marc A

机构信息

Dept of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Kansas Medical Center, 3901 Rainbow Blvd, Kansas City, KS 66160, USA.

出版信息

Scoliosis. 2010 Jul 13;5:14. doi: 10.1186/1748-7161-5-14.

DOI:10.1186/1748-7161-5-14
PMID:20624320
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2909925/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The use of thoracic pedicle screws in spinal deformity, trauma, and tumor reconstruction is becoming more common. Unsuccessful screw placement may require salvage techniques utilizing transverse process hooks. The effect of different starting point placement techniques on the strength of the transverse process has not previously been reported. The purpose of this paper is to determine the biomechanical properties of the thoracic transverse process following various pedicle screw starting point placement techniques.

METHODS

Forty-seven fresh-frozen human cadaveric thoracic vertebrae from T2 to T9 were disarticulated and matched by bone mineral density (BMD) and transverse process (TP) cross-sectional area. Specimens were randomized to one of four groups: A, control, and three others based on thoracic pedicle screw placement technique; B, straightforward; C, funnel; and D, in-out-in. Initial cortical bone removal for pedicle screw placement was made using a burr at the location on the transverse process or transverse process-laminar junction as published in the original description of each technique. The transverse process was tested measuring load-to-failure simulating a hook in compression mode. Analysis of covariance and Pearson correlation coefficients were used to examine the data.

RESULTS

Technique was a significant predictor of load-to-failure (P = 0.0007). The least squares mean (LS mean) load-to-failure of group A (control) was 377 N, group B (straightforward) 355 N, group C (funnel) 229 N, and group D (in-out-in) 301 N. Significant differences were noted between groups A and C, A and D, B and C, and C and D. BMD (0.925 g/cm2 [range, 0.624-1.301 g/cm2]) was also a significant predictor of load-to-failure, for all specimens grouped together (P < 0.0001) and for each technique (P <0.05). Level and side tested were not found to significantly correlate with load-to-failure.

CONCLUSIONS

The residual coronal plane compressive strength of the thoracic transverse process is dependent upon the screw starting point placement technique. The funnel technique significantly weakens transverse processes as compared to the straightforward technique, which does not significantly weaken the transverse process. It is also dependent upon bone mineral density, and low failure loads even in some control specimens suggest limited usefulness of the transverse process for axial compression loading in the osteoporotic thoracic spine.

摘要

背景

胸椎椎弓根螺钉在脊柱畸形、创伤及肿瘤重建中的应用日益普遍。螺钉置入失败可能需要采用横突钩挽救技术。此前尚未报道不同起始点置入技术对横突强度的影响。本文旨在确定各种椎弓根螺钉起始点置入技术后胸椎横突的生物力学特性。

方法

从T2至T9的47个新鲜冷冻人体尸体胸椎被分离,并根据骨密度(BMD)和横突(TP)横截面积进行匹配。标本随机分为四组:A组为对照组,其他三组基于胸椎椎弓根螺钉置入技术分组;B组为直接法;C组为漏斗法;D组为进出进法。按照每种技术原始描述中公布的方法,在横突或横突-椎板交界处使用磨钻进行椎弓根螺钉置入的初始皮质骨去除。测试横突在模拟钩状压缩模式下的失效载荷。采用协方差分析和Pearson相关系数对数据进行检验。

结果

技术是失效载荷的显著预测因素(P = 0.0007)。A组(对照组)的最小二乘均值(LS均值)失效载荷为377 N,B组(直接法)为355 N,C组(漏斗法)为229 N,D组(进出进法)为301 N。A组与C组、A组与D组、B组与C组以及C组与D组之间存在显著差异。对于所有分组在一起的标本(P < 0.0001)以及每种技术(P < 0.05),BMD(0.925 g/cm² [范围,0.624 - 1.301 g/cm²])也是失效载荷的显著预测因素。未发现测试的节段和侧别与失效载荷有显著相关性。

结论

胸椎横突在冠状面的残余抗压强度取决于螺钉起始点置入技术。与直接法相比,漏斗法显著削弱横突,而直接法不会显著削弱横突。它还取决于骨密度,即使在一些对照标本中低失效载荷也表明在骨质疏松性胸椎中横突用于轴向压缩载荷的作用有限。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f3f3/2909925/60a856fb5e14/1748-7161-5-14-4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f3f3/2909925/91f54c0c23c2/1748-7161-5-14-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f3f3/2909925/56bd29537150/1748-7161-5-14-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f3f3/2909925/bfc059d2f913/1748-7161-5-14-3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f3f3/2909925/60a856fb5e14/1748-7161-5-14-4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f3f3/2909925/91f54c0c23c2/1748-7161-5-14-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f3f3/2909925/56bd29537150/1748-7161-5-14-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f3f3/2909925/bfc059d2f913/1748-7161-5-14-3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f3f3/2909925/60a856fb5e14/1748-7161-5-14-4.jpg

相似文献

1
The effect of starting point placement technique on thoracic transverse process strength: an ex vivo biomechanical study.起始点放置技术对胸椎横突强度的影响:一项体外生物力学研究。
Scoliosis. 2010 Jul 13;5:14. doi: 10.1186/1748-7161-5-14.
2
Pedicle and transverse process screws of the upper thoracic spine. Biomechanical comparison of loads to failure.上胸椎椎弓根螺钉与横突螺钉。失效载荷的生物力学比较。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1999 Apr 1;24(7):654-8. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199904010-00008.
3
Pedicle Screw With Increased Cortical Purchase Can Be Inserted With Same Accuracy as the Screw in Straightforward Trajectory Using 3D Modeling Landmarks.使用三维建模地标,可将具有更大皮质骨把持力的椎弓根螺钉以与直线路径螺钉相同的精度插入。
Spine Deform. 2018 Jan;6(1):20-27. doi: 10.1016/j.jspd.2017.06.004.
4
Using lamina screws as a salvage technique at C-7: computed tomography and biomechanical analysis using cadaveric vertebrae. Laboratory investigation.在C-7节段使用椎板螺钉作为挽救技术:使用尸体椎骨的计算机断层扫描和生物力学分析。实验室研究。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2009 Jul;11(1):28-33. doi: 10.3171/2009.3.SPINE08648.
5
Which salvage fixation technique is best for the failed initial screw fixation at the cervicothoracic junction? A biomechanical comparison study.哪种挽救性固定技术最适合于颈胸交界处初次螺钉固定失败的情况?一项生物力学比较研究。
Eur Spine J. 2017 Sep;26(9):2417-2424. doi: 10.1007/s00586-017-5239-8. Epub 2017 Jul 27.
6
Use of the anatomic trajectory for thoracic pedicle screw salvage after failure/violation using the straight-forward technique: a biomechanical analysis.在使用直接技术失败/违反后,利用解剖轨迹进行胸椎椎弓根螺钉补救的应用:一项生物力学分析。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2003 Sep 15;28(18):2072-7. doi: 10.1097/01.BRS.0000084628.37133.BA.
7
Paravertebral foramen screw fixation for posterior cervical spine fusion: biomechanical study and description of a novel technique.颈椎后路融合术中椎旁孔螺钉固定:生物力学研究及一种新技术的描述
J Neurosurg Spine. 2017 Oct;27(4):415-420. doi: 10.3171/2016.12.SPINE16803. Epub 2017 May 12.
8
Biomechanical study of the funnel technique applied in thoracic pedicle screw replacement.应用于胸椎椎弓根螺钉置换的漏斗技术的生物力学研究
Afr Health Sci. 2014 Sep;14(3):716-24. doi: 10.4314/ahs.v14i3.30.
9
A biomechanical assessment of infra-laminar hooks as an alternative to supra-laminar hooks in thoracolumbar fixation.胸腰椎固定中,对椎板下钩作为椎板上钩替代物的生物力学评估。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006 Apr 20;31(9):967-71. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000214932.49027.6a.
10
Pullout strength of pedicle screws versus pedicle and laminar hooks in the thoracic spine.胸椎椎弓根螺钉与椎弓根及椎板钩的拔出强度
Acta Orthop Belg. 2001 Apr;67(2):157-63.

引用本文的文献

1
Defining anatomical landmarks for simulated juxtapedicular screw placement for posterior spinal fusion in adolescent patients with scoliosis.
Spine Deform. 2025 Sep 19. doi: 10.1007/s43390-025-01160-6.
2
Assessment of the tolerance angle for pedicle screw insertion.椎弓根螺钉置入耐受角度的评估。
Med Biol Eng Comput. 2024 Apr;62(4):1265-1275. doi: 10.1007/s11517-023-03002-x. Epub 2024 Jan 4.
3
The Transverse Process Trajectory Technique: An Alternative for Thoracic Pedicle Screw Implantation-Radiographic and Biomechanical Analysis.横突轨迹技术:一种胸椎椎弓根螺钉植入的替代方法——影像学及生物力学分析

本文引用的文献

1
Difficult thoracic pedicle screw placement in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.青少年特发性脊柱侧凸中困难的胸椎椎弓根螺钉置入
J Spinal Disord Tech. 2008 May;21(3):187-91. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e318073cc1d.
2
Pedicle screw placement accuracy: a meta-analysis.椎弓根螺钉置入准确性:一项荟萃分析。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007 Feb 1;32(3):E111-20. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000254048.79024.8b.
3
Accuracy of pedicle screw placement for upper and middle thoracic pathologies without coronal plane spinal deformity using conventional methods.
Int J Spine Surg. 2021 Apr;15(2):315-323. doi: 10.14444/8041. Epub 2021 Apr 1.
4
Biomechanical Analysis of the Proximal Adjacent Segment after Multilevel Instrumentation of the Thoracic Spine: Do Hooks Ease the Transition?胸椎多节段器械固定后近端相邻节段的生物力学分析:钩是否有助于过渡?
Global Spine J. 2016 Jun;6(4):335-43. doi: 10.1055/s-0035-1563611. Epub 2015 Aug 21.
J Spinal Disord Tech. 2006 Aug;19(6):436-41. doi: 10.1097/00024720-200608000-00011.
4
Accuracy and safety of thoracic pedicle screw placement in spinal deformities.脊柱畸形中胸椎椎弓根螺钉置入的准确性与安全性。
J Spinal Disord Tech. 2005 Dec;18(6):522-6. doi: 10.1097/01.bsd.0000154448.90707.a8.
5
Free hand pedicle screw placement in the thoracic spine: is it safe?胸椎徒手椎弓根螺钉置入:安全吗?
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2004 Feb 1;29(3):333-42; discussion 342. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000109983.12113.9b.
6
Effect of various tapping diameters on insertion of thoracic pedicle screws: a biomechanical analysis.不同攻丝直径对胸椎椎弓根螺钉置入的影响:一项生物力学分析
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2003 Sep 15;28(18):2066-71. doi: 10.1097/01.BRS.0000084665.31967.02.
7
Thoracic pedicle screw instrumentation using the "Funnel Technique": part 2. Clinical experience.
J Spinal Disord Tech. 2002 Dec;15(6):450-3. doi: 10.1097/00024720-200212000-00002.
8
The accuracy of pedicle screw placement in the thoracic spine using the "Funnel Technique": part 1. A cadaveric study.使用“漏斗技术”在胸椎中置入椎弓根螺钉的准确性:第1部分。尸体研究。
J Spinal Disord Tech. 2002 Dec;15(6):445-9. doi: 10.1097/00024720-200212000-00001.
9
In vivo accuracy of thoracic pedicle screws.胸椎椎弓根螺钉的体内准确性。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2001 Nov 1;26(21):2340-6. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200111010-00010.
10
The use of pedicle-screw internal fixation for the operative treatment of spinal disorders.椎弓根螺钉内固定术在脊柱疾病手术治疗中的应用。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2000 Oct;82(10):1458-76. doi: 10.2106/00004623-200010000-00013.