Departments of Critical Care Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2011 Sep;12(5):560-5. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0b013e3181e8b3ee.
To compare the correlation of intracranial pressure (ICP) measurement and time to detection of ICP crises (defined as ICP ≥ 20 mm Hg for ≥ 5 mins) between an intraparenchymal (IP) monitor and external ventricular drain (EVD) in children for whom continuous cerebrospinal fluid diversion was used as a therapy for severe traumatic brain injury.
Academic, pediatric intensive care unit.
Retrospective review of a prospectively collected pediatric neurotrauma database.
Children with severe traumatic brain injury (Glasgow Coma Scale score of ≤ 8) who underwent ICP monitoring with both IP and EVD techniques were studied. In cohort 1 (n = 58), hourly ICP measurements were extracted from the medical record; in cohort 2 (n = 4), ICP measurements were collected every minute by an automated data-collection system.
The mean absolute difference in ICP (|N5ICP|N5) and intraclass correlation coefficients were calculated. Timing to detection of ICP crises was analyzed. Data were expressed as mean ± sem. For cohort 1, 7,387 hrs of data were analyzed; 399 hrs (23,940 mins) were analyzed for cohort 2. In cohort 1, the |N5ICP|N5 was 3.10 ± 0.04 mm Hg (intraclass correlation coefficients = 0.98, p < .001). The |N5ICP|N5 in cohort 2 was 3.30 ± 0.05 mm Hg (intraclass correlation coefficients = 0.98, p < .001). In cohort 2, a total of 75 ICP crises were observed. Fifty-five (73%) were detected first by the IP monitor, of which 35 were not identified by the EVD monitor. Time between IP and EVD detection of a crisis was 12.60 ± 2.34 mins.
EVD and IP measurements of ICP were highly correlated, although intermittent EVD ICP measurements may fail to identify ICP events when continuously draining cerebrospinal fluid. In institutions that use continuous cerebrospinal fluid diversion as a therapy, a two-monitor system may be valuable for accomplishing monitoring and therapeutic goals.
比较颅内压(ICP)测量与 ICP 危机(定义为 ICP≥20mmHg 持续≥5min)检测时间之间的相关性,这些儿童接受持续脑脊髓液引流作为严重创伤性脑损伤的治疗。
学术性儿科重症监护病房。
前瞻性收集的儿科神经创伤数据库的回顾性分析。
接受颅内压监测的严重创伤性脑损伤(格拉斯哥昏迷量表评分≤8)儿童,使用脑内(IP)探头和外部脑室引流(EVD)技术。在队列 1(n=58)中,从病历中提取每小时 ICP 测量值;在队列 2(n=4)中,通过自动数据采集系统每 1min 收集一次 ICP 测量值。
计算 ICP 的平均绝对差值(|N5ICP|N5)和组内相关系数。分析 ICP 危机的检测时间。数据表示为均值±SEM。队列 1分析了 7387 小时的数据;队列 2分析了 399 小时(23940min)的数据。在队列 1 中,|N5ICP|N5 为 3.10±0.04mmHg(组内相关系数=0.98,p<.001)。在队列 2 中,|N5ICP|N5 为 3.30±0.05mmHg(组内相关系数=0.98,p<.001)。在队列 2 中,共观察到 75 次 ICP 危机。55 次(73%)首次由 IP 探头检测到,其中 35 次未被 EVD 探头检测到。从 IP 到 EVD 检测到危机的时间为 12.60±2.34min。
EVD 和 IP 测量的 ICP 高度相关,尽管间歇性 EVD ICP 测量在持续引流脑脊髓液时可能无法识别 ICP 事件。在使用持续脑脊髓液引流作为治疗方法的机构中,双探头系统可能对实现监测和治疗目标有价值。