• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Benefits of wellness interventions for persons with chronic and disabling conditions: a review of the evidence.对患有慢性和致残性疾病的人群进行健康干预的益处:证据综述。
Disabil Health J. 2010 Jul;3(3):133-45. doi: 10.1016/j.dhjo.2009.10.007.
2
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
3
Differences among participants' response to a wellness intervention for individuals with spinal cord injuries.脊髓损伤个体的健康干预反应的参与者差异。
Disabil Health J. 2020 Jan;13(1):100842. doi: 10.1016/j.dhjo.2019.100842. Epub 2019 Sep 20.
4
Behavioural interventions for type 2 diabetes: an evidence-based analysis.2型糖尿病的行为干预:一项基于证据的分析。
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2009;9(21):1-45. Epub 2009 Oct 1.
5
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
6
Participation in environmental enhancement and conservation activities for health and well-being in adults: a review of quantitative and qualitative evidence.成年人参与促进环境改善和保护活动对健康与福祉的影响:定量和定性证据综述
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 May 21;2016(5):CD010351. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010351.pub2.
7
Secondary analysis of a scoping review of health promotion interventions for persons with disabilities: Do health promotion interventions for people with mobility impairments address secondary condition reduction and increased community participation?对残疾人士健康促进干预措施的范围综述的二次分析:针对行动障碍人士的健康促进干预措施是否解决了次要病症的减少和增加社区参与的问题?
Disabil Health J. 2011 Apr;4(2):129-39. doi: 10.1016/j.dhjo.2010.05.002. Epub 2010 Jul 14.
8
Recovery schools for improving behavioral and academic outcomes among students in recovery from substance use disorders: a systematic review.改善物质使用障碍康复期学生行为和学业成果的康复学校:一项系统综述
Campbell Syst Rev. 2018 Oct 4;14(1):1-86. doi: 10.4073/csr.2018.9. eCollection 2018.
9
Adaptation of a wellness intervention for women with chronic disabling conditions.针对患有慢性致残性疾病的女性调整健康干预措施。
J Holist Nurs. 2004 Mar;22(1):12-31. doi: 10.1177/0898010104263230.
10
Behavioural modification interventions for medically unexplained symptoms in primary care: systematic reviews and economic evaluation.行为修正干预对初级保健中无法用医学解释的症状:系统评价和经济评估。
Health Technol Assess. 2020 Sep;24(46):1-490. doi: 10.3310/hta24460.

引用本文的文献

1
The Influence of Attribution Style and Goal Accessibility on Health Beliefs and Exercise Willingness: Experimental Evidence from University Students.归因风格和目标可及性对健康信念及锻炼意愿的影响:来自大学生的实验证据
Behav Sci (Basel). 2025 Jun 2;15(6):763. doi: 10.3390/bs15060763.
2
Clinical Practice Guidelines for mental health and well-being in patients with chronic medical illnesses.慢性疾病患者心理健康与幸福的临床实践指南。
Indian J Psychiatry. 2024 Jan;66(Suppl 2):S338-S352. doi: 10.4103/indianjpsychiatry.indianjpsychiatry_603_23. Epub 2024 Jan 24.
3
Translation and Validation of the Malay Version of the WHO-5 Well-Being Index: Reliability and Validity Evidence from a Sample of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Patients.世界卫生组织 5 项幸福感指数(WHO-5)马来语版的翻译及验证:来自 2 型糖尿病患者样本的信度和效度证据。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Apr 6;19(7):4415. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19074415.
4
Call for action: incorporating wellness practices into a holistic management plan for rheumatoid arthritis-going beyond treat to target.行动呼吁:将健康实践纳入类风湿关节炎的整体管理计划——超越治疗目标。
RMD Open. 2021 Dec;7(3). doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2021-001959.
5
Nursing interventions to cover patients' basic needs in the intensive care context - A systematic review.重症监护环境下满足患者基本需求的护理干预措施——系统评价。
Nurs Open. 2022 Jan;9(1):122-139. doi: 10.1002/nop2.1110. Epub 2021 Nov 2.
6
Differences among participants' response to a wellness intervention for individuals with spinal cord injuries.脊髓损伤个体的健康干预反应的参与者差异。
Disabil Health J. 2020 Jan;13(1):100842. doi: 10.1016/j.dhjo.2019.100842. Epub 2019 Sep 20.
7
Psychological interventions for behavioral adjustments in diabetes care - a value-based approach to disease control.糖尿病护理中行为调整的心理干预——一种基于价值的疾病控制方法。
Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2018 May 4;11:145-155. doi: 10.2147/PRBM.S117224. eCollection 2018.
8
Reducing barriers to healthy weight: Planned and responsive adaptations to a lifestyle intervention to serve people with impaired mobility.降低健康体重障碍:为行动不便人群提供生活方式干预服务的计划和响应性调整。
Disabil Health J. 2018 Apr;11(2):315-323. doi: 10.1016/j.dhjo.2017.10.008. Epub 2017 Oct 27.
9
Meaning of self-management from the perspective of individuals with traumatic spinal cord injury, their caregivers, and acute care and rehabilitation managers: an opportunity for improved care delivery.从创伤性脊髓损伤患者、他们的护理人员以及急性护理和康复管理人员的角度看自我管理的意义:改善护理服务的契机。
BMC Neurol. 2016 Jan 23;16:11. doi: 10.1186/s12883-016-0534-2.
10
A systematic review of the efficacy of self-management programs for increasing physical activity in community-dwelling adults with acquired brain injury (ABI).一项关于自我管理计划对提高社区居住的后天性脑损伤(ABI)成年人身体活动水平有效性的系统评价。
Syst Rev. 2015 Apr 19;4:51. doi: 10.1186/s13643-015-0039-x.

本文引用的文献

1
Health promotion for persons with disabilities: moving beyond rehabilitation.促进残疾人健康:超越康复。
Am J Health Promot. 1988 Spring;2(4):29-44. doi: 10.4278/0890-1171-2.4.29.
2
Public health goals for persons with disabilities: looking ahead to 2020.残疾人的公共卫生目标:展望 2020 年。
Disabil Health J. 2009 Jul;2(3):111-5. doi: 10.1016/j.dhjo.2009.03.002.
3
The dilemma of measuring perceived health status in the context of disability.在残疾背景下衡量感知健康状况的困境。
Disabil Health J. 2009 Apr;2(2):49-56. doi: 10.1016/j.dhjo.2008.12.003. Epub 2009 Mar 20.
4
Office on disability, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.美国卫生与公众服务部残疾事务办公室。
Disabil Health J. 2008 Jan;1(1):5-6. doi: 10.1016/j.dhjo.2007.10.001.
5
A power primer.强力底漆。
Psychol Bull. 1992 Jul;112(1):155-9. doi: 10.1037//0033-2909.112.1.155.
6
Searching the literature for evidence.在文献中寻找证据。
Rehabil Nurs. 2008 Jul-Aug;33(4):163-9. doi: 10.1002/j.2048-7940.2008.tb00222.x.
7
Building health promotion interventions for persons with chronic disabling conditions.为患有慢性致残性疾病的人构建健康促进干预措施。
Fam Community Health. 2006 Jan-Mar;29(1 Suppl):28S-34S. doi: 10.1097/00003727-200601001-00006.
8
Self-management interventions for chronic illness.慢性病的自我管理干预措施。
Lancet. 2004;364(9444):1523-37. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)17277-2.
9
Self-management education: history, definition, outcomes, and mechanisms.自我管理教育:历史、定义、结果及机制
Ann Behav Med. 2003 Aug;26(1):1-7. doi: 10.1207/S15324796ABM2601_01.
10
Health promotion practices in women with multiple sclerosis: increasing quality and years of healthy life.多发性硬化症女性的健康促进实践:提高生活质量与延长健康寿命
Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am. 2001 Feb;12(1):9-22.

对患有慢性和致残性疾病的人群进行健康干预的益处:证据综述。

Benefits of wellness interventions for persons with chronic and disabling conditions: a review of the evidence.

机构信息

The University of Texas at Austin School of Nursing, Center for Health Promotion and Disease Prevention Research in Underserved Populations, 1700 Red River, Austin, Texas 78701, USA.

出版信息

Disabil Health J. 2010 Jul;3(3):133-45. doi: 10.1016/j.dhjo.2009.10.007.

DOI:10.1016/j.dhjo.2009.10.007
PMID:20628583
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2901558/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Persons living with the effects of chronic and disabling conditions are often at increased risk for the development of secondary conditions and disabilities that can lead to further decline in health status, independence, functional status, life satisfaction, and overall quality of life.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to review the evidence for the benefits of wellness/health promotion interventions for persons with chronic and disabling conditions.

METHODS

The authors conducted a Medline search (1990-2007) using terms related to wellness and health promotion cross-referenced with general terms for chronic and disabling conditions, as well as 15 specific chronic and/or disabling conditions (e.g., multiple sclerosis, spinal cord injury). Selection of studies was limited to those published in English that reported randomized controlled trails or prospective studies that involved adult human subjects with a chronic and/or disabling condition. All selected studies focused on some aspect of a wellness or health promotion intervention and involved a comparison or control group. Of the 5,847 studies initially identified in the search using medical subject heading terms, 190 met the criteria for full review. Data were extracted from these publications and summarized using descriptive statistics.

RESULTS

Almost all studies (95%) explored the effects of wellness intervention in a sample diagnosed with a single condition (e.g., cancer, stroke, arthritis). Although the mean sample size was 100, the range in sample size varied widely (6-688); 25% of the studies had sample of 30 or fewer. Almost all studies (89.5%) reported positive effects of the wellness intervention, although the delivery and content of interventions as well as the measurement of outcomes, varied greatly.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings support an immediate post-intervention positive impact of wellness interventions across persons with a wide variety of chronic and disabling conditions. Future research that clearly specifies primary study outcomes and follows the CONSORT guidelines will strengthen future reviews of the evidence and facilitate application of the evidence of practice.

摘要

背景

患有慢性和致残性疾病的人往往面临着继发疾病和残疾的风险增加,这可能导致健康状况、独立性、功能状态、生活满意度和整体生活质量进一步下降。

目的

本研究旨在回顾针对患有慢性和致残性疾病的人群进行健康促进/养生干预的益处的证据。

方法

作者使用与养生和健康促进相关的术语进行了 Medline 检索(1990-2007 年),并交叉引用了与慢性和致残性疾病相关的一般术语,以及 15 种特定的慢性和/或致残性疾病(如多发性硬化症、脊髓损伤)。研究选择仅限于以英文发表的、报告随机对照试验或涉及患有慢性和/或致残性疾病的成年人类受试者的前瞻性研究。所有选定的研究都侧重于养生或健康促进干预的某个方面,并涉及比较组或对照组。在使用医学主题词搜索时,最初在搜索中确定了 5847 项研究,其中有 190 项符合全面审查的标准。从这些出版物中提取数据并使用描述性统计进行总结。

结果

几乎所有研究(95%)都在患有单一疾病(如癌症、中风、关节炎)的样本中探索了养生干预的效果。尽管平均样本量为 100,但样本量的范围差异很大(6-688);25%的研究样本少于 30 人。几乎所有研究(89.5%)都报告了养生干预的积极效果,尽管干预措施的提供和内容以及结果的测量差异很大。

结论

我们的研究结果支持养生干预对患有各种慢性和致残性疾病的人群具有即时的干预后积极影响。未来明确规定主要研究结果并遵循 CONSORT 指南的研究将加强对证据的回顾,并促进实践证据的应用。