Division of Hospital Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois 60611, USA.
J Hosp Med. 2011 Feb;6(2):88-93. doi: 10.1002/jhm.714.
Effective collaboration and teamwork is essential in providing safe and effective care. Research reveals deficiencies in teamwork on medical units involving hospitalists.
The aim of this study was to assess the impact of an intervention, Structured Inter-Disciplinary Rounds (SIDR), on nurses' ratings of collaboration and teamwork.
The study was a controlled trial involving an intervention and control hospitalist unit. The intervention, SIDR, combined a structured format for communication with a forum for regular interdisciplinary meetings. We asked nurses to rate the quality of communication and collaboration with hospitalists using a 5-point ordinal scale. We also assessed teamwork and safety climate using a validated instrument. Multivariable regression analyses were used to assess the impact on length of stay (LOS) and cost using both a concurrent and historic control.
A total of 49 of 58 (84%) nurses completed surveys. A larger percentage of nurses rated the quality of communication and collaboration with hospitalists as high or very high on the intervention unit compared to the control unit (80% vs. 54%; P = 0.05). Nurses also rated the teamwork and safety climate significantly higher on the intervention unit (P = 0.008 and P = 0.03 for teamwork and safety climate, respectively). Multivariable analyses demonstrated no difference in the adjusted LOS and an inconsistent effect on cost.
SIDR had a positive effect on nurses' ratings of collaboration and teamwork on a hospitalist unit, yet no impact on LOS and cost. Further study is required to assess the impact of SIDR on patient safety measures.
有效的协作和团队合作对于提供安全有效的护理至关重要。研究表明,医院医师参与的医疗单位在团队合作方面存在不足。
本研究旨在评估一项干预措施(结构化跨学科查房,SIDR)对护士对协作和团队合作的评价的影响。
这是一项涉及干预和对照医院医师单元的对照试验。干预措施 SIDR 结合了结构化的沟通格式和定期跨学科会议的论坛。我们要求护士使用 5 分制ordinal 量表对与医院医师的沟通和协作质量进行评分。我们还使用经过验证的工具评估团队合作和安全氛围。使用多变量回归分析,同时使用同期和历史对照来评估对住院时间(LOS)和成本的影响。
共有 58 名护士中的 49 名(84%)完成了调查。与对照组相比,干预组的护士对与医院医师的沟通和协作质量评价更高,认为质量高或非常高的护士比例更高(80%对 54%;P=0.05)。护士对干预组的团队合作和安全氛围的评价也显著更高(P=0.008 和 P=0.03,分别用于团队合作和安全氛围)。多变量分析表明,调整后的 LOS 无差异,成本的影响不一致。
SIDR 对医院医师单元的护士对协作和团队合作的评价产生了积极影响,但对 LOS 和成本没有影响。需要进一步研究评估 SIDR 对患者安全措施的影响。