• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

英国医学研究理事会 CLASICC 试验:腹腔镜辅助与开腹结直肠癌手术的 5 年随访结果

Five-year follow-up of the Medical Research Council CLASICC trial of laparoscopically assisted versus open surgery for colorectal cancer.

机构信息

Section of Translational Anaesthesia and Surgery, Leeds Institute of Molecular Medicine, St James's University Hospital, Leeds, UK.

出版信息

Br J Surg. 2010 Nov;97(11):1638-45. doi: 10.1002/bjs.7160.

DOI:10.1002/bjs.7160
PMID:20629110
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The UK Medical Research Council CLASICC trial assessed the safety and efficacy of laparoscopically assisted surgery in comparison with open surgery for colorectal cancer. The results of the 5-year follow-up analysis are presented.

METHODS

Five-year outcomes were analysed and included overall and disease-free survival, and local, distant and wound/port-site recurrences. Two exploratory analyses were performed to evaluate the effect of age (70 years or less, or more than 70 years) on overall survival between the two groups, and the effect of the learning curve.

RESULTS

No differences were found between laparoscopically assisted and open surgery in terms of overall survival, disease-free survival, and local and distant recurrence. Wound/port-site recurrence rates in the laparoscopic arm remained stable at 2.4 per cent. Conversion to open operation was associated with significantly worse overall but not disease-free survival, which was most marked in the early follow-up period. The effect of surgery did not differ between the age groups, and surgical experience did not impact on the 5-year results.

CONCLUSION

The 5-year analyses confirm the oncological safety of laparoscopic surgery for both colonic and rectal cancer. The use of laparoscopic surgery to maximize short-term outcomes does not compromise the long-term oncological results.

REGISTRATION NUMBER

ISRCTN74883561 (http://www.controlled-trials.com).

摘要

介绍

英国医学研究理事会 CLASICC 试验评估了腹腔镜辅助手术与开腹手术治疗结直肠癌的安全性和疗效。现将 5 年随访分析结果报告如下。

方法

分析了 5 年的结局,包括总生存率、无病生存率以及局部、远处和切口/端口部位复发。进行了两项探索性分析,以评估两组之间年龄(<70 岁或≥70 岁)对总生存率的影响,以及学习曲线的影响。

结果

腹腔镜辅助手术与开腹手术在总生存率、无病生存率以及局部和远处复发方面无差异。腹腔镜组的切口/端口部位复发率稳定在 2.4%。转为开腹手术与总生存率显著降低相关,但与无病生存率无关,且在早期随访中最为明显。手术效果在不同年龄组之间无差异,手术经验也未对 5 年结果产生影响。

结论

5 年分析结果证实了腹腔镜手术治疗结肠癌和直肠癌的肿瘤安全性。为了最大限度地提高短期结局而使用腹腔镜手术不会影响长期肿瘤学结果。

注册号

ISRCTN74883561(http://www.controlled-trials.com)。

相似文献

1
Five-year follow-up of the Medical Research Council CLASICC trial of laparoscopically assisted versus open surgery for colorectal cancer.英国医学研究理事会 CLASICC 试验:腹腔镜辅助与开腹结直肠癌手术的 5 年随访结果
Br J Surg. 2010 Nov;97(11):1638-45. doi: 10.1002/bjs.7160.
2
Long-term follow-up of the Medical Research Council CLASICC trial of conventional versus laparoscopically assisted resection in colorectal cancer.MRC CLASICC 试验:结直肠癌开腹与腹腔镜辅助手术的长期随访。
Br J Surg. 2013 Jan;100(1):75-82. doi: 10.1002/bjs.8945. Epub 2012 Nov 6.
3
Adhesions and incisional hernias following laparoscopic versus open surgery for colorectal cancer in the CLASICC trial.CLASICC试验中腹腔镜与开腹手术治疗结直肠癌后的粘连和切口疝
Br J Surg. 2010 Jan;97(1):70-8. doi: 10.1002/bjs.6742.
4
A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer.腹腔镜辅助结肠癌切除术与开腹结肠癌切除术的比较。
N Engl J Med. 2004 May 13;350(20):2050-9. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa032651.
5
Outcome of laparoscopic colorectal resection.腹腔镜结直肠切除术的结果
Surgeon. 2008 Dec;6(6):357-60. doi: 10.1016/s1479-666x(08)80008-x.
6
Randomized trial of laparoscopic-assisted resection of colorectal carcinoma: 3-year results of the UK MRC CLASICC Trial Group.腹腔镜辅助结直肠癌切除术的随机试验:英国医学研究理事会CLASICC试验组的3年结果
J Clin Oncol. 2007 Jul 20;25(21):3061-8. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2006.09.7758.
7
Oncological Outcomes After Anastomotic Leakage After Surgery for Colon or Rectal Cancer: Increased Risk of Local Recurrence.结直肠癌手术后吻合口漏的肿瘤学结局:局部复发风险增加。
Ann Surg. 2022 Feb 1;275(2):e420-e427. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003889.
8
The effect of increasing body mass index on laparoscopic surgery for colon and rectal cancer.体重指数增加对结肠癌和直肠癌腹腔镜手术的影响。
Colorectal Dis. 2018 Sep;20(9):778-788. doi: 10.1111/codi.14107. Epub 2018 May 4.
9
Laparoscopically assisted vs open colectomy for colon cancer: a meta-analysis.腹腔镜辅助与开放性结肠癌切除术的比较:一项荟萃分析。
Arch Surg. 2007 Mar;142(3):298-303. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.142.3.298.
10
Long-term results of laparoscopic colorectal cancer resection.腹腔镜结直肠癌切除术的长期结果
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Apr 16;2008(2):CD003432. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003432.pub2.

引用本文的文献

1
Using machine learning algorithms to predict risk factors of heart failure after complete mesocolic excision in colorectal cancer patients.使用机器学习算法预测结直肠癌患者完整结肠系膜切除术后心力衰竭的危险因素。
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 15;15(1):25441. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-11726-z.
2
Postoperative Pain and Incisional Hernia of Specimen Extraction Sites for Minimally Invasive Rectal Cancer Surgery: Comparison of Periumbilical Midline Incision Versus Pfannenstiel Incision.微创直肠癌手术标本取出部位的术后疼痛与切口疝:脐周正中切口与耻骨上横切口的比较
J Clin Med. 2025 Apr 15;14(8):2697. doi: 10.3390/jcm14082697.
3
Oncological and Functional Outcomes After Minimally Invasive Surgery for Mid and Low Rectal Adenocarcinoma: A Review.
中低位直肠腺癌微创手术后的肿瘤学及功能预后:综述
Cureus. 2025 Apr 14;17(4):e82238. doi: 10.7759/cureus.82238. eCollection 2025 Apr.
4
Comparison of body composition changes and nutritional status after surgery between older Japanese patients with upper and lower gastrointestinal cancer.日本老年上消化道癌和下消化道癌患者术后身体成分变化及营养状况的比较。
JAR Life. 2025 Feb 12;14:100006. doi: 10.1016/j.jarlif.2025.100006. eCollection 2025.
5
Risk Factors for Anastomotic Leak in Patients Undergoing Surgery for Rectal Cancer Resection: A Retrospective Analysis.直肠癌切除手术患者吻合口漏的危险因素:一项回顾性分析
Cureus. 2025 Feb 25;17(2):e79647. doi: 10.7759/cureus.79647. eCollection 2025 Feb.
6
Design and validation of a simulation-based training module for ileo-transverse intracorporeal anastomosis.基于模拟的回肠-横结肠体内吻合术训练模块的设计与验证
Surg Endosc. 2025 Feb;39(2):1397-1405. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-11516-0. Epub 2025 Jan 13.
7
Comparative effectiveness of laparoscopic versus open colectomy in colon cancer patients: a study protocol for emulating a target trial using cancer registry data.腹腔镜与开腹结肠切除术治疗结肠癌患者的比较效果:一项使用癌症登记数据模拟目标试验的研究方案
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2025 Jan 11;151(1):34. doi: 10.1007/s00432-024-06057-x.
8
Pushing boundaries: simultaneous minimal-invasive resection of complex colorectal liver metastases and its primary tumor.突破界限:复杂结直肠癌肝转移灶及其原发肿瘤的同期微创切除
Surg Endosc. 2025 Jan;39(1):401-408. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-11411-8. Epub 2024 Nov 20.
9
Assessing the performance of non-specialised private hospitals in Malaysia - an upper-middle-income medical tourism destination country using the Pabón-Lasso model.评估马来西亚非专科医院的表现 - 一个中上收入的医疗旅游目的地国家,使用 Pabón-Lasso 模型。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Nov 16;24(1):1414. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11768-5.
10
Efficacy and safety of laparoscopic resection of colorectal cancer in non-elite cases.非精英病例中腹腔镜结直肠癌切除术的疗效与安全性
Surg Today. 2025 May;55(5):676-684. doi: 10.1007/s00595-024-02951-6. Epub 2024 Oct 29.