Suppr超能文献

强直性脊柱炎和银屑病关节炎与类风湿关节炎中抗TNF药物转换的观察性研究。

Observational study of switching anti-TNF agents in ankylosing spondylitis and psoriatic arthritis versus rheumatoid arthritis.

作者信息

Haberhauer Guenther, Strehblow Christoph, Fasching Peter

机构信息

5th Department of Internal Medicine (Endocrinology and Rheumatology), Wilhelminen-Hospital, Vienna, Austria.

出版信息

Wien Med Wochenschr. 2010 May;160(9-10):220-4. doi: 10.1007/s10354-010-0795-0.

Abstract

Anti-TNF agents like infliximab, etanercept and adalimumab are efficacious in the treatment of ankylosing spondylitis (AS), psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Lack of efficacy, side effects and loss of efficacy over time may be reasons for switching to a second anti-TNF agent and sometimes switching to a third anti-TNF agent may be useful. Effects of switching may be different in patients with AS, PsA and RA. We analysed data of 301 patients with rheumatic diseases treated with anti-TNF agents. Forty-six patients had AS, 63 PsA and 192 RA. Totally 38% of these patients received more than one anti-TNF agent. Switching to a second anti-TNF agent was necessary in 115 (38%) of our patients, in detail in 11 of our AS patients, in 21 of PsA patients and in 83 of RA patients. Patient with PsA showed the best response rate to the second anti-TNF agent. Finally, 46 patients, 5 with SPA, 3 with PsA and 38 with RA received a third anti-TNF agent. We conclude that anti-TNF switching in AS and PsA is less frequent than in RA patients. Survival of anti-TNF agents in AS (p = 0.025) and also in PsA (n.s., p = 0.215) seems to be better than in RA. Switching anti-TNF agents for loss of efficacy over time may have the best effect in patients with AS, PsA and predominantly in RA. Our data suggest that switching for lack of efficacy in RA patients cannot be recommended, but may be an alternative in patients with AS and PsA. Switching to a second anti-TNF agent for side effects may be reasonable, switching to a third anti-TNF agent again for side effects cannot be recommended.

摘要

英夫利昔单抗、依那西普和阿达木单抗等抗TNF药物在治疗强直性脊柱炎(AS)、银屑病关节炎(PsA)和类风湿关节炎(RA)方面疗效显著。疗效不佳、副作用以及随着时间推移疗效丧失可能是换用第二种抗TNF药物的原因,有时换用第三种抗TNF药物可能会有帮助。AS、PsA和RA患者换用药物后的效果可能有所不同。我们分析了301例接受抗TNF药物治疗的风湿性疾病患者的数据。其中46例患有AS,63例患有PsA,192例患有RA。这些患者中共有38%接受了不止一种抗TNF药物。我们的115例(38%)患者有必要换用第二种抗TNF药物,具体而言,11例AS患者、21例PsA患者和83例RA患者。PsA患者对第二种抗TNF药物的反应率最佳。最后,46例患者,5例患有SPA,3例患有PsA,38例患有RA,接受了第三种抗TNF药物。我们得出结论,AS和PsA患者中抗TNF药物的换药频率低于RA患者。抗TNF药物在AS患者中的留存率(p = 0.025)以及在PsA患者中的留存率(无统计学意义,p = 0.215)似乎高于RA患者。随着时间推移因疗效丧失而换用抗TNF药物,对AS、PsA患者尤其是RA患者可能效果最佳。我们的数据表明,不建议RA患者因疗效不佳而换药,但对于AS和PsA患者可能是一种选择。因副作用而换用第二种抗TNF药物可能合理,因副作用再次换用第三种抗TNF药物则不建议。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验