Corcodel Nicoleta, Rammelsberg Peter, Moldovan Ovidiu, Dreyhaupt Jens, Hassel Alexander J
Department of Prosthodontics, University of Heidelberg, Im Neunheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
Int J Prosthodont. 2009 Jan-Feb;22(1):75-7.
The aim of this study was to investigate color matching under natural daylight and daylight lamp conditions. Twenty-nine preclinical students underwent a training course and then matched randomly chosen shade tabs of Vita 3D-Master Shade Guide under both natural daylight and daylight lamp conditions. Color difference (delta Eab) between presented and selected shade tabs was calculated. Statistical differences were explored by use of multivariate analyses. Mean delta Eab was 2.5 (1.0 to 4.3) with daylight lamp and 3.4 (0.9 to 7.4) with natural daylight. The difference was statistically significant (P < .001). The use of a daylight lamp helps to standardize light conditions and significantly improve the ability to match colors.
本研究的目的是调查在自然日光和日光灯下的颜色匹配情况。29名临床前学生参加了一个培训课程,然后在自然日光和日光灯下对随机选择的Vita 3D-Master比色板色片进行匹配。计算所呈现色片与所选色片之间的色差(ΔEab)。通过多变量分析探索统计学差异。使用日光灯光照时平均ΔEab为2.5(1.0至4.3),使用自然日光时为3.4(0.9至7.4)。差异具有统计学意义(P <.001)。使用日光灯光照有助于使光照条件标准化,并显著提高颜色匹配能力。