Marwick T H, Stewart W J, Currie P J, Cosgrove D M
Department of Cardiology, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, OH 44195.
Am Heart J. 1991 Jul;122(1 Pt 1):149-56. doi: 10.1016/0002-8703(91)90772-a.
Surgical valve repair for mitral regurgitation has significant advantages over valve replacement, but little is known about the mechanisms of its failure. This echocardiographic study examined abnormalities leading to failed mitral valve repair in two populations: "immediate failure" of the valve repair in the operating room requiring a second run of cardiopulmonary bypass and "late failure" of valve repair necessitating reoperation on another occasion. Intraoperative echocardiography (IOE) after cardiopulmonary bypass was performed in 309 patients undergoing valve repair for mitral regurgitation over a 3-year period. Twenty-six (8%) of these patients had immediate failure of the repair demonstrated by IOE, requiring further repair or replacement during the same thoracotomy. The causes of immediate failure were left ventricular outflow tract obstruction (10 patients), incomplete correction (10 patients), and suture dehiscence (six patients). Echocardiography was performed on 17 patients requiring reoperation for recurrent mitral regurgitation who had undergone previous primary valve repair. These late failures resulted from progressive degenerative leaflet or chordal disease (n = 9) or suture dehiscence of the annular ring or the leaflet resection site (n = 6). In only two patients early in the series did the problem originate from inadequate initial surgery. IOE is an effective marker for unsuccessful mitral valve repair, and affords an understanding of the mechanism of the persistent dysfunction. Immediate failure of mitral repair may be reduced by greater attention to the mechanism of valve dysfunction and by changes in valvuloplasty technique to avoid outflow tract obstruction. Late failure after mitral repair occurs predominantly due to progression of disease, particularly in patients with severe myxomatous or annular abnormalities that are prone to progress.
二尖瓣反流的外科瓣膜修复术相对于瓣膜置换术具有显著优势,但对于其失败机制却知之甚少。这项超声心动图研究检查了导致二尖瓣修复失败的异常情况,涉及两类人群:一类是在手术室中瓣膜修复“即刻失败”,需要再次进行体外循环;另一类是瓣膜修复“晚期失败”,需要在其他时间再次手术。在3年时间里,对309例接受二尖瓣反流瓣膜修复术的患者进行了体外循环后的术中超声心动图(IOE)检查。其中26例(8%)患者经IOE证实修复即刻失败,需要在同一次开胸手术中进一步修复或置换。即刻失败的原因包括左心室流出道梗阻(10例患者)、矫正不彻底(10例患者)和缝线裂开(6例患者)。对17例曾接受初次瓣膜修复后因复发性二尖瓣反流需要再次手术的患者进行了超声心动图检查。这些晚期失败是由进行性退行性瓣叶或腱索病变(n = 9)或瓣环或瓣叶切除部位的缝线裂开(n = 6)所致。在该系列研究早期,只有2例患者的问题源于初始手术不充分。IOE是二尖瓣修复不成功的有效指标,有助于了解持续功能障碍的机制。通过更多地关注瓣膜功能障碍机制以及改变瓣膜成形技术以避免流出道梗阻,可减少二尖瓣修复的即刻失败。二尖瓣修复后的晚期失败主要是由于疾病进展,特别是在患有严重黏液瘤样或瓣环异常且易于进展的患者中。