Weaver Harlan
Department of History of Consciousness, University of California, Santa Cruz, CA, USA.
Perspect Biol Med. 2010 Summer;53(3):471-9. doi: 10.1353/pbm.0.0162.
Sandra Harding's newest book, Sciences from Below: Feminisms, Postcolonialities, and Modernities, continues her work in feminist standpoint theory and science and technologies studies, asking how we might judge "good" science. Attentive to race, class, gender, and imperialism, Harding critically examines Northern and Southern sciences and technologies by adopting the perspective of those who see from below. This vision from the peripheries lets Harding question stories of modern scientific progress, revealing a multiplicity of "ethnosciences" and critiquing modernity itself. However, while Harding aims to produce knowledge for the North's others by emphasizing woman's experience, she fails to question the category "woman," ignoring contemporary transgender and queer scholarship. Further, it is Harding's care for the North's subjugated others that motivates her writing, revealing that the struggle to achieve the standpoint "from below" so critical to her project is fueled by what her ally Maria Puig de la Bellacasa would term not thinking from, but thinking with, or, more precisely, "thinking with care."
桑德拉·哈丁的新书《自下而上的科学:女性主义、后殖民主义与现代性》延续了她在女性主义立场理论以及科学技术研究方面的工作,探讨我们如何评判“好的”科学。哈丁关注种族、阶级、性别和帝国主义,通过采用从底层视角观察的人的观点,批判性地审视了北方和南方的科学技术。这种来自边缘的视角使哈丁能够质疑现代科学进步的故事,揭示出多种“民族科学”并对现代性本身进行批判。然而,尽管哈丁旨在通过强调女性的经验为北方的他者创造知识,但她未能质疑“女性”这一范畴,忽视了当代跨性别和酷儿研究。此外,正是哈丁对北方被压迫他者的关怀推动了她的写作,这表明为实现对她的项目至关重要的“自下而上”的立场而进行的斗争,是由她的盟友玛丽亚·皮格·德拉·贝拉卡萨所说的不是“脱离思考”,而是“与……一起思考”,或者更准确地说,是“带着关怀思考 ”所激发的。