OMICS: A Journal of Integrative Biology, New Rochelle, New York, USA.
OMICS. 2023 Nov;27(11):497-498. doi: 10.1089/omi.2023.0216. Epub 2023 Oct 23.
Critically informed engagement in politics and the knowledge of social theory help democratize knowledge production, and redress power asymmetries in science and society. A feminist lens is one of the many ways in which power asymmetries in science can be critically unpacked and interrupted. There are many strands of feminism and feminist theory that differ in their approaches to resist patriarchy and injustices in science and society. As an example, I adopt here the definition of feminism of the late cultural critic bell hooks because her works underscore that feminism is an intersectional liberatory methodology for everyone to resist multiple forms of oppression simultaneously. Queer theory is a strand of social theory that came to prominence since the 1990s in particular. Queer feminism continues to shape feminist writing on science cultures and the knowledge-based innovations contemporary science strives to accomplish. Systems science brings about systems thinking, and that includes rethinking science as culture beyond a narrow realm of technology, and being cognizant of the broader social, feminist, queer, and political contexts of science around the world.
批判性地参与政治和了解社会理论有助于使知识生产民主化,并纠正科学和社会中的权力不对称。女性主义视角是批判性地揭示和打断科学中权力不对称的众多方法之一。有许多女权主义和女权主义理论的分支,它们在抵制科学和社会中的父权制和不公正方面的方法有所不同。例如,我在这里采用已故文化评论家贝儿·胡克斯(bell hooks)的女权主义定义,因为她的作品强调女权主义是一种交叉的解放方法论,每个人都可以同时抵制多种形式的压迫。酷儿理论是社会理论的一个分支,自 20 世纪 90 年代以来尤其引人注目。酷儿女权主义继续塑造着关于科学文化和当代科学努力实现的基于知识的创新的女权主义写作。系统科学带来了系统思维,这包括将科学作为文化而不仅仅是技术的狭隘领域来重新思考,并意识到世界各地科学的更广泛的社会、女权主义、酷儿和政治背景。