Suppr超能文献

整脊手法治疗或常规骨科护理用于骨科候诊患者:一项实用随机对照试验。

Naprapathic manual therapy or conventional orthopedic care for outpatients on orthopedic waiting lists?: A pragmatic randomized controlled trial.

机构信息

Orthopedic Department, Blekingesjukhuset, Karlskrona, Sweden.

出版信息

Clin J Pain. 2010 Sep;26(7):602-10. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0b013e3181d71ebd.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Traditionally, orthopedic outpatient waiting lists are long, and many referrals are for conditions that do not respond to interventions available at an orthopedic outpatient department. The overall objective of this trial was to investigate whether it is possible to reduce orthopedic waiting lists through integrative medicine. Specific aims were to compare the effects of naprapathic manual therapy to conventional orthopedic care for outpatients with nonurgent musculoskeletal disorders unlikely to benefit from surgery regarding pain, physical function, and perceived recovery.

METHODS

Seventy-eight patients referred to an orthopedic outpatient department in Sweden were included in this pragmatic randomized controlled trial. The 2 interventions compared were naprapathic manual therapy (index group) and conventional orthopedic care (control group). Pain, physical function, and perceived recovery were measured by questionnaires at baseline and after 12, 24, and 52 weeks. The number of patients being discharged from the waiting lists and the level of agreement concerning management decisions between the naprapath and the orthopedists were also estimated.

RESULTS

After 52 weeks, statistically significant differences between the groups were found regarding impairment in pain, increased physical function, and regarding perceived recovery, favoring the index group. Sixty-two percent of the patients in the index group agreed to be discharged from the waiting list. The level of agreement concerning the management decisions was 80%.

DISCUSSION

The trial suggests that naprapathic manual therapy may be an alternative to consider for orthopedic outpatients with disorders unlikely to benefit from surgery.

摘要

目的

传统上,矫形外科门诊的候诊名单很长,许多转诊都是针对那些在矫形外科门诊无法接受干预的疾病。本试验的总体目的是研究是否可以通过整合医学来减少矫形外科的候诊名单。具体目标是比较整脊手法治疗与传统矫形护理对外科手术效果不佳的非紧急肌肉骨骼疾病患者的效果,比较疼痛、身体功能和感知恢复方面的差异。

方法

本研究纳入了 78 名在瑞典矫形外科门诊就诊的患者,采用实用随机对照试验设计。比较的两种干预措施是整脊手法治疗(实验组)和传统矫形护理(对照组)。在基线、12、24 和 52 周时通过问卷评估疼痛、身体功能和感知恢复情况。还估计了从候诊名单中出院的患者人数以及整脊师和矫形医师之间管理决策的一致性程度。

结果

52 周后,两组之间在疼痛、身体功能的改善和感知恢复方面存在统计学显著差异,实验组更优。实验组中有 62%的患者同意从候诊名单中出院。管理决策的一致性程度为 80%。

讨论

本试验表明,对于那些不太可能从手术中受益的骨科门诊患者,整脊手法治疗可能是一种可供选择的治疗方法。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验