Scopinho Rosemeire Aparecida
Universidade Federal de São Carlos, SP, Brazil.
Cien Saude Colet. 2010 Jun;15 Suppl 1:1575-84. doi: 10.1590/s1413-81232010000700069.
The wide spread of cooperated and self-managed ways of work, not only in the urban but also in rural areas, makes relevant the debate on the contributive potential of these experiences for the solution of social problems. This article tries to reflect on the way this organizational logic is able to improve life and health conditions of rural workers. Studying the organizational process of a rural settling, I have tried to understand the meaning given to health-illness by these workers and the health practices being developed. Considering the objective and subjective aspects involved in the concept of life condition and starting from a perspective which deals with the process of knowledge production as social construction, I analyzed and compared information obtained from documentary analysis, interviews and observation of the daily routine of life and work in the settling. The contrast between urban and rural life way is a strong feature in the meaning of health-illness. Between idealized concepts and feasible practices, the attempt to solve problems and make health a social right, came up against the fragmentary and inarticulate way that public policy involved in the land reform has been implemented by the state.
合作式和自我管理式工作方式不仅在城市而且在农村地区广泛传播,这使得关于这些经验对解决社会问题的贡献潜力的辩论变得重要起来。本文试图思考这种组织逻辑能够改善农村工人生活和健康状况的方式。通过研究一个农村定居点的组织过程,我试图理解这些工人赋予健康与疾病的意义以及正在开展的健康实践。考虑到生活条件概念中涉及的客观和主观方面,并从将知识生产过程视为社会建构的角度出发,我分析并比较了从文献分析、访谈以及对定居点生活和工作日常的观察中获得的信息。城乡生活方式的对比在健康与疾病的意义中是一个显著特征。在理想化概念与可行实践之间,将解决问题并使健康成为一项社会权利的尝试,遭遇了国家实施土地改革时公共政策所采用的零散且不清晰的方式。