Lima-Arsati Ynara Bosco Oliveira, Martins Carolina Castro, Rocha Lília Alves, Cury Jaime Aparecido
São Leopoldo Mandic School of Dentistry and Research Center, Campinas, SP, Brazil.
Braz Dent J. 2010;21(2):91-7. doi: 10.1590/s0103-64402010000200001.
Fingernail has been suggested as a biomarker of fluoride (F) body burden, but there is no consensus if it would be a reliable indicator of F exposure from dentifrice. Therefore, the present study was conducted to investigate if fingernails would have sensitivity to detect F exposure from dentifrice in young children. Twenty-three 1-3-year-old children living in the city of Piracicaba (0.72 ppm F in water), Brazil, were enrolled in two phases of different F exposure: in phase A (1st to 11th week), they were exposed to the combination of F from diet (solids and liquids) and dentifrice (1,500 microg F/g as MFP), and in phase B (12th to 29th week), only to F from diet (the use of F dentifrice was interrupted). Fingernails were weekly clipped during 35 weeks for F determination. F intake from diet and dentifrice in each phase was also determined. Both analyses were made with ion-specific electrode. F intake (Mean +/- SD) was significantly higher (p<0.01) when the children were exposed to F from diet+dentifrice than only to F from diet (0.086 +/- 0.032 and 0.040 +/- 0.009 mg F/day/kg body weight, respectively). However, F concentrations in nails collected during the whole experimental period of 35 weeks presented great variation with no trend of decreasing after F dentifrice intake interruption. The findings suggest that fingernail may not be a reliable F biomarker of body burden from dentifrice.
指甲已被提议作为氟化物(F)体内负荷的生物标志物,但对于它是否是牙膏氟暴露的可靠指标尚无定论。因此,本研究旨在调查指甲是否对检测幼儿牙膏氟暴露具有敏感性。23名居住在巴西皮拉西卡巴市(水中氟含量为0.72 ppm)的1至3岁儿童参与了两个不同氟暴露阶段的研究:在A阶段(第1周至第11周),他们暴露于饮食(固体和液体)和牙膏中的氟组合(以MFP形式存在,1500微克F/克),在B阶段(第12周至第29周),仅暴露于饮食中的氟(牙膏氟的使用中断)。在35周内每周采集指甲用于氟含量测定。还测定了每个阶段饮食和牙膏中的氟摄入量。两项分析均使用离子特异性电极进行。当儿童暴露于饮食+牙膏中的氟时,氟摄入量(平均值±标准差)显著更高(p<0.01),分别为0.086±0.032和0.040±0.009毫克F/天/千克体重,而仅暴露于饮食中的氟时。然而,在整个35周实验期间采集的指甲中的氟浓度变化很大,在牙膏氟摄入中断后没有下降趋势。研究结果表明,指甲可能不是牙膏氟体内负荷的可靠生物标志物。