Suppr超能文献

[结肠切除术后的最佳吻合方式]

[The best anastomoses after colonic resection].

作者信息

Kracht M

出版信息

Ann Chir. 1991;45(4):295-8.

PMID:2064291
Abstract

Among the numerous anastomotic techniques after colonic resection, the mechanical sutures using staplers have been credited with a lower incidence of anastomotic leakage than hand-sewn anastomoses. This hypothesis has been tested in two multicentre, prospective, randomized trials after right hemicolectomy for carcinoma and after left colectomy with colorectal anastomosis. After right hemicolectomy, the stapled anastomosis using the GIA and TA staplers appeared to be superior to all hand-sewn anastomoses. This superiority was not apparent after left colectomy followed by colorectal anastomosis. Although the leakage rate of stapled anastomoses was similar to hand-sewn anastomoses, they carry a high rate of intra-operative mishaps. Furthermore, the stapler does not permit a lower anastomosis in this study. Finally, the overall cost of a stapled anastomosis is superior to the cost of an hand-sewn anastomosis.

摘要

在结肠切除术后众多的吻合技术中,使用吻合器的机械缝合被认为比手工缝合吻合口漏的发生率更低。这一假设已在两项多中心、前瞻性、随机试验中得到验证,一项是针对结肠癌行右半结肠切除术后,另一项是左半结肠切除并结直肠吻合术后。右半结肠切除术后,使用GIA和TA吻合器的吻合似乎优于所有手工缝合。左半结肠切除并结直肠吻合术后,这种优势并不明显。尽管吻合器吻合的漏率与手工缝合相似,但术中失误率较高。此外,在本研究中吻合器不适合低位吻合。最后,吻合器吻合的总体成本高于手工缝合。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验