Suppr超能文献

在标准系列和补充化妆品系列中对个人护理产品过敏原进行斑贴试验的结果:2000-2007 年梅奥诊所接触性皮炎组对 945 例患者的分析。

Results of patch testing to personal care product allergens in a standard series and a supplemental cosmetic series: an analysis of 945 patients from the Mayo Clinic Contact Dermatitis Group, 2000-2007.

机构信息

Department of Dermatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.

出版信息

J Am Acad Dermatol. 2010 Nov;63(5):789-98. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2009.11.033.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Patch testing to a standard screening series of allergens in combination with supplemental cosmetic allergens is often used to diagnose allergic contact dermatitis due to personal care products.

OBJECTIVE

To report results of patch testing to skin care product allergens contained in a standard series and a supplemental cosmetic series and to compare efficacy of this combined series in detecting positive reactions to personal care product allergens with the efficacy of various standard screening series.

METHODS

Positive reaction rates to skin care product allergens were tabulated for patients who underwent patch testing to both standard and cosmetic series allergens at Mayo Clinic between 2000 and 2007. Data were compared with skin care allergens detected on standard screening series, including the thin-layer rapid use epicutaneous (TRUE) test.

RESULTS

Of 945 patch-tested patients, 68.4% had at least one positive reaction and 47.3% had at least two positive reactions. Also, 49.4% of patients reacted to at least one preservative; 31.2% reacted to at least one fragrance/botanical additive. Compared with use of our standard series and cosmetic series, use of the TRUE test would have missed 22.5% of patients with preservative allergy, 11.3% with fragrance/botanical allergy, and 17.3% with vehicle allergy.

LIMITATIONS

Various allergens tested over time, patch test reading by residents, and lack of confirmation of allergen in personal care products.

CONCLUSION

Standard patch-test screening series miss a substantial number of patients with skin care product ingredient allergy.

摘要

背景

对标准筛选系列过敏原和补充性化妆品过敏原进行斑贴试验,通常用于诊断个人护理产品引起的过敏性接触性皮炎。

目的

报告标准系列和补充性化妆品系列中所含的护肤品过敏原斑贴试验结果,并比较该联合系列与各种标准筛选系列检测个人护理产品过敏原阳性反应的效果。

方法

对 2000 年至 2007 年在梅奥诊所接受标准系列和化妆品系列过敏原斑贴试验的患者进行皮肤护理产品过敏原阳性反应率的统计。并将数据与标准筛选系列中检测到的皮肤护理过敏原进行比较,包括薄层快速使用皮内试验(TRUE)。

结果

在 945 名接受斑贴试验的患者中,68.4%至少有一个阳性反应,47.3%至少有两个阳性反应。此外,49.4%的患者对至少一种防腐剂有反应;31.2%的患者对至少一种香料/植物添加剂有反应。与使用我们的标准系列和化妆品系列相比,TRUE 测试会错过 22.5%的防腐剂过敏患者、11.3%的香料/植物过敏患者和 17.3%的载体过敏患者。

局限性

不同时间测试的各种过敏原、住院医生进行斑贴试验读数以及缺乏对个人护理产品中过敏原的确认。

结论

标准斑贴试验筛选系列会遗漏大量对皮肤护理产品成分过敏的患者。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验