Veterans Affairs Center for the Management of Complex Chronic Care, University of Illinois at Chicago, Illinois 60612-7324, Chicago, USA.
Ann Intern Med. 2010 Jul 20;153(2):69-75. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-153-2-201007200-00002.
A contextual error occurs when a physician overlooks elements of a patient's environment or behavior that are essential to planning appropriate care. In contrast to biomedical errors, which are not patient-specific, contextual errors represent a failure to individualize care.
To explore the frequency and circumstances under which physicians probe contextual and biomedical red flags and avoid treatment error by incorporating what they learn from these probes.
An incomplete randomized block design in which unannounced, standardized patients visited 111 internal medicine attending physicians between April 2007 and April 2009 and presented variants of 4 scenarios. In all scenarios, patients presented both a contextual and a biomedical red flag. Responses to probing about flags varied in whether they revealed an underlying complicating biomedical or contextual factor (or both) that would lead to errors in management if overlooked.
14 practices, including 2 academic clinics, 2 community-based primary care networks with multiple sites, a core safety net provider, and 3 U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs facilities.
Primary outcomes were the proportion of visits in which physicians probed for contextual and biomedical factors in response to hints or red flags and the proportion of visits that resulted in error-free treatment plans.
Physicians probed fewer contextual red flags (51%) than biomedical red flags (63%). Probing for contextual or biomedical information in response to red flags was usually necessary but not sufficient for an error-free plan of care. Physicians provided error-free care in 73% of the uncomplicated encounters, 38% of the biomedically complicated encounters, 22% of the contextually complicated encounters, and 9% of the combined biomedically and contextually complicated encounters.
Only 4 case scenarios were used. The study assessed physicians' propensity to make errors when every encounter provided an opportunity to do so and did not measure actual error rates that occur in primary care settings because of inattention to context.
Inattention to contextual information, such as a patient's transportation needs, economic situation, or caretaker responsibilities, can lead to contextual error, which is not currently measured in assessments of physician performance.
U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs Health Services Research and Development Service
当医生忽略患者环境或行为中对制定适当护理计划至关重要的因素时,就会发生上下文错误。与不是针对特定患者的生物医学错误不同,上下文错误代表了对护理个性化的失败。
探讨医生探查上下文和生物医学警示标志的频率和情况,并通过整合他们从这些探查中获得的信息来避免治疗错误。
在 2007 年 4 月至 2009 年 4 月期间,未经宣布的标准化患者访问了 111 名内科主治医生,采用不完全随机块设计,并呈现了 4 种情况的变体。在所有情况下,患者都出现了上下文和生物医学警示标志。对标志进行探查的反应因是否揭示了潜在的复杂生物医学或上下文因素(或两者兼而有之)而异,如果忽略这些因素,可能会导致管理错误。
14 个实践点,包括 2 个学术诊所、2 个具有多个站点的社区初级保健网络、一个核心安全网提供商和 3 个美国退伍军人事务设施。
主要结果是医生在响应提示或警示标志时探查上下文和生物医学因素的就诊比例,以及导致无错误治疗计划的就诊比例。
医生探查上下文警示标志的比例(51%)低于生物医学警示标志(63%)。响应警示标志探查上下文或生物医学信息通常是必要的,但不足以制定无错误的护理计划。医生在 73%的简单情况下、38%的生物医学复杂情况下、22%的上下文复杂情况下和 9%的生物医学和上下文复杂情况下提供了无错误的护理。
仅使用了 4 个案例场景。该研究评估了医生在每次就诊都有机会犯错时犯错的倾向,并且没有测量由于对上下文的不关注而在初级保健环境中实际发生的错误率。
对患者的交通需求、经济状况或照顾者责任等上下文信息的不关注可能导致上下文错误,目前在评估医生绩效时并未测量这种错误。
美国退伍军人事务部医疗保健服务研究与发展服务