• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估患者采集音频审核和反馈质量改进计划对退伍军人事务医疗保健系统临床医生关注患者生活背景和医疗保健费用的影响。

Evaluation of a Patient-Collected Audio Audit and Feedback Quality Improvement Program on Clinician Attention to Patient Life Context and Health Care Costs in the Veterans Affairs Health Care System.

机构信息

Department of Medicine, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago.

Center of Innovation for Complex Chronic Healthcare, Jesse Brown VA Chicago Health Care System, Chicago, Illinois.

出版信息

JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Jul 1;3(7):e209644. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.9644.

DOI:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.9644
PMID:32735338
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7395234/
Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Evidence-based care plans can fail when they do not consider relevant patient life circumstances, termed contextual factors, such as a loss of social support or financial hardship. Preventing these contextual errors can reduce obstacles to effective care.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effectiveness of a quality improvement program in which clinicians receive ongoing feedback on their attention to patient contextual factors.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: In this quality improvement study, patients at 6 Department of Veterans Affairs outpatient facilities audio recorded their primary care visits from May 2017 to May 2019. Encounters were analyzed using the Content Coding for Contextualization of Care (4C) method. A feedback intervention based on the 4C coded analysis was introduced using a stepped wedge design. In the 4C coding schema, clues that patients are struggling with contextual factors are termed contextual red flags (eg, sudden loss of control of a chronic condition), and a positive outcome is prospectively defined for each encounter as a quantifiable improvement of the contextual red flag. Data analysis was performed from May to October 2019.

INTERVENTIONS

Clinicians received feedback at 2 intensity levels on their attention to patient contextual factors and on predefined patient outcomes at 4 to 6 months.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Contextual error rates, patient outcomes, and hospitalization rates and costs were measured.

RESULTS

The patients (mean age, 62.0 years; 92% male) recorded 4496 encounters with 666 clinicians. At baseline, clinicians addressed 413 of 618 contextual factors in their care plans (67%). After either standard or enhanced feedback, they addressed 1707 of 2367 contextual factors (72%), a significant difference (odds ratio, 1.3; 95% CI, 1.1-1.6; P = .01). In a mixed-effects logistic regression model, contextualized care planning was associated with a greater likelihood of improved outcomes (adjusted odds ratio, 2.5; 95% CI, 1.5-4.1; P < .001). In a budget analysis, estimated savings from avoided hospitalizations were $25.2 million (95% CI, $23.9-$26.6 million), at a cost of $337 242 for the intervention.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

These findings suggest that patient-collected audio recordings of the medical encounter with feedback may enhance clinician attention to contextual factors, improve outcomes, and reduce hospitalizations. In addition, the intervention is associated with substantial cost savings.

摘要

重要性

当护理计划不考虑相关的患者生活环境(称为情境因素),如社会支持丧失或经济困难时,基于证据的护理计划可能会失败。预防这些情境错误可以减少有效护理的障碍。

目的

评估一种质量改进计划的有效性,该计划中临床医生会收到关于他们对患者情境因素关注的持续反馈。

设计、设置和参与者:在这项质量改进研究中,6 家退伍军人事务部门诊设施的患者从 2017 年 5 月至 2019 年 5 月对他们的初级保健就诊进行了音频记录。使用上下文情境化编码法(4C)对就诊进行了分析。使用逐步楔形设计引入了基于 4C 编码分析的反馈干预。在 4C 编码方案中,患者正在与情境因素作斗争的线索被称为情境红旗(例如,慢性疾病突然失控),并且每个就诊都前瞻性地定义了一个阳性结果,即情境红旗的可量化改善。数据分析于 2019 年 5 月至 10 月进行。

干预措施

临床医生在 4 至 6 个月时收到了关于他们对患者情境因素关注的两种强度级别的反馈以及关于预先定义的患者结果的反馈。

主要结果和措施

测量了情境错误率、患者结果、住院率和住院费用。

结果

患者(平均年龄 62.0 岁;92%为男性)记录了 4496 次就诊和 666 名临床医生的就诊。在基线时,临床医生在他们的护理计划中解决了 618 个情境因素中的 413 个(67%)。在接受标准或增强型反馈后,他们解决了 2367 个情境因素中的 1707 个(72%),这是一个显著差异(优势比,1.3;95%置信区间,1.1-1.6;P=0.01)。在混合效应逻辑回归模型中,情境化护理计划与改善结果的可能性更大相关(调整后的优势比,2.5;95%置信区间,1.5-4.1;P<0.001)。在预算分析中,避免住院的估计节省为 2520 万美元(95%置信区间,2390 万至 2660 万美元),干预费用为 337242 美元。

结论和相关性

这些发现表明,患者对医疗就诊的音频记录以及反馈可能会增强临床医生对情境因素的关注,改善结果并减少住院治疗。此外,该干预措施与大量成本节省相关。

相似文献

1
Evaluation of a Patient-Collected Audio Audit and Feedback Quality Improvement Program on Clinician Attention to Patient Life Context and Health Care Costs in the Veterans Affairs Health Care System.评估患者采集音频审核和反馈质量改进计划对退伍军人事务医疗保健系统临床医生关注患者生活背景和医疗保健费用的影响。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Jul 1;3(7):e209644. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.9644.
2
Effect of Electronic Health Record Clinical Decision Support on Contextualization of Care: A Randomized Clinical Trial.电子健康记录临床决策支持对医疗照护情境化的影响:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Oct 3;5(10):e2238231. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.38231.
3
Patient-centered decision making and health care outcomes: an observational study.以患者为中心的决策和医疗保健结果:一项观察性研究。
Ann Intern Med. 2013 Apr 16;158(8):573-9. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-158-8-201304160-00001.
4
Effect of an Intensive Outpatient Program to Augment Primary Care for High-Need Veterans Affairs Patients: A Randomized Clinical Trial.强化门诊计划对满足高需求退伍军人事务患者的初级保健的影响:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Intern Med. 2017 Feb 1;177(2):166-175. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.8021.
5
Implementation of a patient-collected audio recording audit & feedback quality improvement program to prevent contextual error: stakeholder perspective.实施患者采集音频记录审核和反馈质量改进计划以预防语境错误:利益相关者视角。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Aug 30;21(1):891. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06921-3.
6
Contextual errors and failures in individualizing patient care: a multicenter study.个体化患者护理中的语境错误和失败:一项多中心研究。
Ann Intern Med. 2010 Jul 20;153(2):69-75. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-153-2-201007200-00002.
7
Impact of Primary Care Intensive Management on High-Risk Veterans' Costs and Utilization: A Randomized Quality Improvement Trial.基层医疗强化管理对高危退伍军人成本和利用的影响:一项随机质量改进试验。
Ann Intern Med. 2018 Jun 19;168(12):846-854. doi: 10.7326/M17-3039. Epub 2018 Jun 5.
8
Assessment of the Protocol-Guided Rapid Evaluation of Veterans Experiencing New Transient Neurological Symptoms (PREVENT) Program for Improving Quality of Care for Transient Ischemic Attack: A Nonrandomized Cluster Trial.评估退伍军人新发性短暂性神经症状快速评估方案(PREVENT)对改善短暂性脑缺血发作护理质量的影响:一项非随机群组试验。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Sep 1;3(9):e2015920. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.15920.
9
Effectiveness of Implementing a Collaborative Chronic Care Model for Clinician Teams on Patient Outcomes and Health Status in Mental Health: A Randomized Clinical Trial.实施临床医生团队协作式慢性病管理模式对改善精神卫生患者结局和健康状况的效果:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Mar 1;2(3):e190230. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.0230.
10
Qualitative analysis of US Department of veterans affairs mental health clinician perspectives on patient-centered care.美国退伍军人事务部心理健康临床医生对以患者为中心护理的观点的定性分析
Int J Qual Health Care. 2016 Jun;28(3):355-62. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzw028. Epub 2016 Mar 29.

引用本文的文献

1
"The start of something that I hope could be greater": Health information technology tools for social care.“我希望可能会更伟大之事的开端”:用于社会护理的健康信息技术工具
SSM Qual Res Health. 2025 Jun;7. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmqr.2025.100544. Epub 2025 Mar 14.
2
Help us document what we already do: pilot study of clinical decision support tools targeting social risk-informed care.协助我们记录我们已经开展的工作:针对社会风险知情护理的临床决策支持工具的试点研究。
JAMIA Open. 2025 May 30;8(3):ooaf045. doi: 10.1093/jamiaopen/ooaf045. eCollection 2025 Jun.
3
Contextual Factors Affecting Adherence Revealed by Old Patients with Heart Failure in Hospital and Primary Care Interactions: A Descriptive Study.

本文引用的文献

1
Contextual Errors in Medical Decision Making: Overlooked and Understudied.医学决策中的情境性错误:被忽视且研究不足。
Acad Med. 2016 May;91(5):657-62. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000001017.
2
Patient-collected audio for performance assessment of the clinical encounter.患者收集的音频用于临床诊疗表现评估。
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2015 Jun;41(6):273-8. doi: 10.1016/s1553-7250(15)41037-2.
3
Adherence therapy improves medication adherence and quality of life in people with Parkinson's disease: a randomised controlled trial.
住院及基层医疗互动中影响老年心力衰竭患者依从性的情境因素:一项描述性研究
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2025 Apr 14;19:1075-1087. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S505297. eCollection 2025.
4
Lessons learned on social health integration: evaluating a novel social health integration and social risk-informed care online continuing professional development course for primary care providers.社会健康整合的经验教训:评估一门面向初级保健提供者的新型社会健康整合与社会风险知情护理在线继续职业发展课程。
BMC Med Educ. 2025 Apr 8;25(1):496. doi: 10.1186/s12909-025-06971-9.
5
Patient and clinician acceptability of automated extraction of social drivers of health from clinical notes in primary care.基层医疗中从临床记录自动提取健康社会驱动因素的患者和临床医生可接受性
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2025 May 1;32(5):855-865. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocaf046.
6
Finding the Value: Identifying the Key Elements of Recorded Clinic Visits From the Perspective of Patients, Clinicians, and Caregivers.寻找价值:从患者、临床医生和护理人员的角度识别门诊记录的关键要素。
Health Expect. 2025 Feb;28(1):e70143. doi: 10.1111/hex.70143.
7
Social Determinants of Health Impact Complications Following Free-Flap Reconstruction for Head and Neck Cancer.健康的社会决定因素对头颈部癌游离皮瓣重建术后并发症的影响。
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2025 Jan;172(1):91-99. doi: 10.1002/ohn.953. Epub 2024 Aug 27.
8
Charting a Path to the Quintuple Aim: Harnessing AI to Address Social Determinants of Health.绘制通往五重目标的路径:利用人工智能解决健康的社会决定因素。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024 May 31;21(6):718. doi: 10.3390/ijerph21060718.
9
CUSCO: An Unobtrusive Custom Secure Audio-Visual Recording System for Ambient Assisted Living.库斯科:一种用于环境辅助生活的不引人注意的定制安全视听记录系统。
Sensors (Basel). 2024 Feb 26;24(5):1506. doi: 10.3390/s24051506.
10
Facilitators and Barriers to a Hospital-Based Communication Skills Training Programme: An Interview Study.基于医院的沟通技巧培训计划的促进因素和障碍:一项访谈研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Mar 9;20(6):4834. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20064834.
坚持治疗可提高帕金森病患者的药物依从性和生活质量:一项随机对照试验。
Int J Clin Pract. 2014 Aug;68(8):963-71. doi: 10.1111/ijcp.12439. Epub 2014 Apr 20.
4
Content coding for contextualization of care: evaluating physician performance at patient-centered decision making.用于医疗情境化的内容编码:评估以患者为中心的决策过程中医师的表现。
Med Decis Making. 2014 Jan;34(1):97-106. doi: 10.1177/0272989X13493146. Epub 2013 Jun 19.
5
Patient-centered decision making and health care outcomes: an observational study.以患者为中心的决策和医疗保健结果:一项观察性研究。
Ann Intern Med. 2013 Apr 16;158(8):573-9. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-158-8-201304160-00001.
6
Uncharted territory: measuring costs of diagnostic errors outside the medical record.未知领域:在病历之外衡量诊断错误的成本。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2012 Nov;21(11):918-24. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2012-000832. Epub 2012 Jul 7.
7
Audit and feedback: effects on professional practice and healthcare outcomes.审核与反馈:对专业实践和医疗结果的影响。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Jun 13;2012(6):CD000259. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000259.pub3.
8
Contextual errors and failures in individualizing patient care: a multicenter study.个体化患者护理中的语境错误和失败:一项多中心研究。
Ann Intern Med. 2010 Jul 20;153(2):69-75. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-153-2-201007200-00002.
9
The stepped wedge trial design: a systematic review.阶梯楔形试验设计:一项系统评价
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2006 Nov 8;6:54. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-6-54.
10
Contextualizing medical decisions to individualize care: lessons from the qualitative sciences.将医疗决策情境化以实现个性化护理:来自定性科学的经验教训。
J Gen Intern Med. 2004 Mar;19(3):281-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2004.30261.x.