Department of Medicine, College of Medicine, Howard University, 2041 Georgia Avenue, Washington, DC 20060, USA.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2010 Jun;7(6):2452-9. doi: 10.3390/ijerph7062452. Epub 2010 May 28.
Living with a canine companion is postulated to increase physical activity. We test the hypotheses that adults living with a canine companion have a higher level of physical activity and reduced mortality risk compared to those not living with a companion animal. A U.S. national health survey with longitudinal mortality follow-up studied 11,394 American men and women aged 40 years and over examined in 1988-1994 followed an average 8.5 years. Measurements at baseline included self-reported companion animals in the household, socio-demographics, health status, physical and biochemical measurements. Outcome measures were leisure-time physical activity (LTPA), and death from all causes. Death during follow-up occurred in 3,187 persons. In bivariate cross-sectional analyses living with a dog was associated with more frequent LTPA and higher survival. In proportional hazards regression analysis, no significant interaction of age, gender or ethnicity with animals was found. After adjusting for confounding by baseline socio-demographics and health status at ages 40+, the hazards ratio (95% confidence limits) for living with a canine companion compared to no animals was 1.21(1.04-1.41, p < 0.001). After also controlling for health behaviors, blood pressure and body mass, C-reactive protein and HDL-cholesterol, the HR was 1.19 (0.97-1.47, NS). In a nationwide cohort of American adults, analyses demonstrated no lower risk of death independent of confounders among those living with canine or feline companions, despite positive association of canine companions with LTPA.
与犬类伴侣生活被认为可以增加身体活动量。我们检验了以下假设:与没有伴侣动物的成年人相比,与犬类伴侣生活的成年人身体活动水平更高,死亡风险更低。这项美国全国性健康调查进行了纵向死亡率随访,研究对象为 1988 年至 1994 年接受检查的 40 岁及以上的 11394 名美国男女,平均随访 8.5 年。基线测量包括家庭中报告的伴侣动物、社会人口统计学、健康状况、身体和生化测量。结果测量指标为休闲时间体力活动(LTPA)和所有原因导致的死亡。随访期间有 3187 人死亡。在双变量横断面分析中,与狗一起生活与更频繁的 LTPA 和更高的生存率相关。在比例风险回归分析中,未发现年龄、性别或种族与动物之间存在显著的相互作用。在调整 40 岁及以上时的基线社会人口统计学和健康状况混杂因素后,与没有动物相比,与犬类伴侣生活的危害比(95%置信区间)为 1.21(1.04-1.41,p<0.001)。在还控制了健康行为、血压和体重、C 反应蛋白和高密度脂蛋白胆固醇后,HR 为 1.19(0.97-1.47,NS)。在一项针对美国成年人的全国性队列研究中,尽管犬类伴侣与 LTPA 呈正相关,但在考虑混杂因素后,与犬类或猫类伴侣生活的成年人死亡风险并没有独立降低。