Paediatrics, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
BMC Pediatr. 2010 Jul 20;10:51. doi: 10.1186/1471-2431-10-51.
During severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) outbreak in Toronto, outpatient clinics at SickKids Hospital were closed to prevent further disease transmission. In response, a decision was made by the neonatal neuro-developmental follow up (NNFU) clinic staff to select patients with scheduled appointments to have a mail/telephone assessment using Ages and Stages Questionnaire (ASQ) or to postpone/skip their visit. The objective of this study was to compare the developmental assessment and its outcome in two groups of NNFU clinic patients, SARS versus non-SARS, over three standard clinic appointments.
We compared the diagnostic accuracy (identification of developmental delay), and patient management (referral for therapy or communication of a new diagnosis) of the strategies used during SARS, April/May 2003, to the standard assessment methods used for patients seen in April/May 2005 (non-SARS). In all cases data were obtained for 3 patient visits: before, during and after these 2 months and were compared using descriptive statistics.
There were 95 patients in the SARS group and 99 non-SARS patients. The gestational age, sex, entry diagnosis and age at the clinic visit was not different between the groups. The NNFU clinic staff mailed ASQ to 27 families during SARS, 17 (63%) were returned, and 8 of the 17 were then contacted by telephone. Criteria used to identify infants at risk selected for either mailed ASQ or phone interviews were not clearly defined in the patients' charts. There was a significant under identification of developmental delay during SARS (18% versus 45%). Of those who responded to the mailed questionnaire, referrals for therapy rates were similar to non-SARS group. The lost to follow up rate was 24% for the SARS group compared with 7% for non-SARS. There was no difference in the overall rate of developmental delay in the two groups as identified at the 'after' visit.
Poor advanced planning led to a haphazard assessment of patients during this infectious disease outbreak. Future pandemic plans should consider planning for outpatient care as well as in hospital management of patients.
在多伦多严重急性呼吸系统综合症(SARS)爆发期间, SickKids 医院的门诊诊所关闭,以防止疾病进一步传播。作为回应,新生儿神经发育随访(NNFU)诊所的工作人员决定选择有预约的患者进行邮件/电话评估,使用年龄与阶段问卷(ASQ),或推迟/跳过他们的就诊。本研究的目的是比较 SARS 期间和非 SARS 期间两组 NNFU 诊所患者在三个标准门诊就诊期间的发育评估及其结果。
我们比较了 SARS 期间(2003 年 4 月/5 月)使用的策略与 2005 年 4 月/5 月(非 SARS)用于患者的标准评估方法的诊断准确性(确定发育迟缓)和患者管理(转介治疗或沟通新诊断)。在所有情况下,均获得了 3 次就诊的数据:就诊前、就诊期间和就诊后,并使用描述性统计进行比较。
SARS 组有 95 例患者,非 SARS 组有 99 例患者。两组患者的胎龄、性别、入组诊断和就诊时年龄无差异。在 SARS 期间,NNFU 诊所工作人员向 27 个家庭邮寄了 ASQ,其中 17 份(63%)被退回,其中 17 份中有 8 份通过电话联系。用于识别选择进行邮件 ASQ 或电话访谈的高危婴儿的标准在患者病历中未明确界定。在 SARS 期间,发育迟缓的识别明显不足(18%对 45%)。对邮寄问卷做出回应的患者中,接受治疗的转介率与非 SARS 组相似。SARS 组的失访率为 24%,而非 SARS 组为 7%。在“就诊后”就诊时,两组的总体发育迟缓率没有差异。
在这次传染病爆发期间,缺乏提前规划导致对患者的评估草率。未来的大流行计划应考虑规划门诊护理以及医院对患者的管理。