Suppr超能文献

内侧视前区损毁或杏仁核损毁对恐惧和记忆的影响不同。

Inactivation of the dorsal or ventral hippocampus with muscimol differentially affects fear and memory.

机构信息

University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.

出版信息

Brain Res. 2010 Sep 24;1353:145-51. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2010.07.030. Epub 2010 Jul 18.

Abstract

It was recently found that temporary inactivation of the dorsal hippocampus with lidocaine impaired fear memory, whereas temporary inactivation of the ventral hippocampus did not. These site-specific deficits, however, may have resulted from disruption of axonal signals arriving from structures outside of the hippocampus, or from disruption of axons that pass through the hippocampus entirely. This is problematic because the hippocampus receives extensive afferent input from both the amygdala and the septum, which also play very important roles in fear and fear memory. To mitigate this problem, rats were infused with the GABA(A) receptor agonist muscimol, into either the dorsal or the ventral hippocampus, just after an "acquisition" session in which the rats were shocked from an electrified probe. A "retention" test in the same apparatus was conducted 24h later, when the hippocampus was no longer inactivated, and the probe was no longer electrified. Dorsal hippocampal inactivation just after acquisition impaired conditioned fear behavior (probe avoidance) during the retention test, whereas ventral hippocampal inactivation after acquisition did not. However, muscimol inactivation of the ventral hippocampus during an "acquisition" session selectively impaired unconditioned fear behavior, replicating earlier findings with lidocaine, a sodium channel blocker. Because muscimol hyperpolarizes neurons through a post-synaptic, GABA(A) receptor-mediated increase of chloride conductance-whereas lidocaine produces indiscriminate disruption of all axonal signalling-its effects are more likely to be restricted to intrinsic neurons within the area of infusion. These results provide strong evidence that afferent input from brain structures located outside of the hippocampus is not responsible for the differential effects of dorsal and ventral hippocampal inactivation on fear memory.

摘要

最近发现,用利多卡因暂时失活背侧海马体损害了恐惧记忆,而暂时失活腹侧海马体则没有。然而,这些特定部位的缺陷可能是由于来自海马体外部的轴突信号中断,或者是由于穿过海马体的轴突完全中断所致。这是有问题的,因为海马体从杏仁核和隔核接收广泛的传入输入,这些结构在恐惧和恐惧记忆中也起着非常重要的作用。为了解决这个问题,在大鼠接受电击探针电击的“获得”(acquisition)阶段之后,将 GABA(A) 受体激动剂 muscimol 输注到背侧或腹侧海马体中。在相同的装置中进行“保留”(retention)测试 24 小时后,当海马体不再失活,探针不再通电时。获得后立即对背侧海马体进行失活会损害保留测试中的条件性恐惧行为(探针回避),而获得后对腹侧海马体进行失活则不会。然而,在“获得”阶段,腹侧海马体的 muscimol 失活选择性地损害了非条件性恐惧行为,这与之前使用钠离子通道阻滞剂利多卡因的发现相吻合。因为 muscimol 通过突触后 GABA(A) 受体介导的氯离子电导增加使神经元超极化——而利多卡因则对所有轴突信号进行不分青红皂白的破坏——因此其作用更可能局限于输注区域内的内在神经元。这些结果提供了强有力的证据,表明来自海马体外部的脑结构的传入输入不是背侧和腹侧海马体失活对恐惧记忆的差异影响的原因。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验