Palomares Melanie, Egeth Howard
Department of Psychology, The University of South Carolina, 1512 Pendleton Street, Columbia, SC 29208, United States.
Vision Res. 2010 Sep 15;50(19):2000-7. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2010.07.011. Epub 2010 Jul 18.
The task of detection requires that at least one target component (i.e. "feature") be detected, while the task of identification requires the detection and integration of multiple features into a recognizable object. Enumeration seems to involve aspects of both feature detection and object identification. As in identification, it requires the detection of multiple features, but as in detection, it does not require the explicit encoding of a global form. Enumeration of briefly presented objects is accurate up to the "subitizing capacity" of 3-5 items. We discuss the relation of enumeration to visual detection and identification by considering the effect of target visibility on subitizing capacity. We found that while the distribution of enumeration responses changes with contrast, subitizing capacity is generally invariant with contrast until it nears detection threshold. These results suggest that component detection (associated with number estimation) and component integration (associated with subitizing) behaved differentially as contrast was manipulated. We speculate that subitizing capacity is linked to the approximate number of detected features adequate for recognizing shapes.
检测任务要求至少检测到一个目标成分(即“特征”),而识别任务则要求检测多个特征并将其整合为一个可识别的物体。计数似乎涉及特征检测和物体识别两个方面。与识别一样,它需要检测多个特征,但与检测一样,它不需要对全局形式进行明确编码。对短暂呈现物体的计数在3至5个项目的“即时计数能力”范围内是准确的。我们通过考虑目标可见性对即时计数能力的影响来讨论计数与视觉检测和识别之间的关系。我们发现,虽然计数反应的分布随对比度而变化,但即时计数能力在接近检测阈值之前通常不受对比度影响。这些结果表明,在对比度被控制时,成分检测(与数量估计相关)和成分整合(与即时计数相关)表现不同。我们推测,即时计数能力与足以识别形状的已检测特征的近似数量有关。