Balls M, Botham P A, Bruner L H, Spielmann H
ECVAM, JRC Environment Institute, 21020 Ispra (VA, Italy.
Toxicol In Vitro. 1995 Dec;9(6):871-929. doi: 10.1016/0887-2333(95)00092-5.
This is the final report of the Management Team for a European Commission/British Home Office (EC/HO) validation study on alternatives to the Draize eye irritation test. The principal goal of the study was to establish whether one or more of nine non-animal tests could be used to replace the Draize test for all severely irritating materials (or those belonging to specific classes) or the animal test completely for chemicals with or without regard to chemical class. Sixty chemicals were independently selected, coded and supplied, then the data obtained in 37 laboratories were analysed independently. The results of comparisons between 27 alternative test index scores and the Modified Maximum Average Scores (MMASs) obtained in the Draize eye test were compared. Tables of results showing Pearson's product moment correlation coefficients and Spearman's rank coefficients for each laboratory are provided, and correlation matrices of alternative test index scores among the different groups of laboratories are shown for each endpoint. Scatterplots are provided, in which the alternative test scores obtained by the lead laboratories for the nine tests are plotted against the MMAS for the full set of chemicals and 12 surfactants. It is concluded that, with the possible exception of predicting the irritancy of surfactants, none of the nine tests met any of the four performance targets. Possible reasons for this outcome are discussed.
这是管理团队关于欧盟委员会/英国内政部(EC/HO)对德莱兹眼刺激试验替代方法验证研究的最终报告。该研究的主要目标是确定九种非动物试验中的一种或多种是否可用于替代德莱兹试验,以检测所有强刺激性物质(或特定类别物质),或者是否可完全替代针对各类或不考虑化学类别的化学品的动物试验。独立选择、编码并提供了60种化学品,然后对在37个实验室中获得的数据进行独立分析。将27种替代试验指标得分与德莱兹眼试验中获得的修正最大平均得分(MMASs)进行比较。提供了各实验室的结果表,显示了皮尔逊积矩相关系数和斯皮尔曼等级系数,并针对每个终点展示了不同实验室组之间替代试验指标得分的相关矩阵。提供了散点图,其中牵头实验室针对九种试验获得的替代试验得分与全套化学品和12种表面活性剂的MMAS相对应。结论是,除了预测表面活性剂刺激性这一可能的例外情况外,九种试验均未达到四个性能目标中的任何一个。讨论了导致这一结果的可能原因。