Department of Medical Physics and Clinical Engineering, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK.
Physiol Meas. 2010 Sep;31(9):1105-18. doi: 10.1088/0967-3334/31/9/003. Epub 2010 Jul 23.
Body temperature measurement is an important clinical parameter. The performance of a number of non-invasive thermometers was measured by comparing intra- and inter-operator variability (n = 100) and clinical accuracy (n = 61). Variability was elevated in febrile compared to normothermic subjects for axillary and oral electronic contact thermometer measures and a temporal artery thermometer (p < 0.001 for both). Temporal artery thermometry and one mode of an infrared tympanic thermometer demonstrated significant clinical inaccuracy (p < 0.001 for both). Electronic contact thermometer repeatability and reproducibility are highly variable in febrile adults both in the axilla and oral cavity. Infrared thermometry of the skin over the superficial temporal artery is unreliable for measuring core body temperature, particularly in febrile subjects and patients in theatre. The infrared tympanic thermometers tested are acceptable for clinical practice; however, care should be exercised with the different modes of operation offered.
体温测量是一个重要的临床参数。通过比较操作者内和操作者间的变异性(n=100)和临床准确性(n=61),对一些非侵入式体温计的性能进行了测量。与正常体温相比,腋窝和口腔电子接触式体温计以及颞动脉体温计的发热患者的变异性更高(两者均为 p<0.001)。颞动脉测温法和一种红外鼓膜体温计显示出明显的临床不准确性(两者均为 p<0.001)。在发热的成年人中,电子接触式体温计在腋窝和口腔中的重复性和再现性差异很大。颞浅动脉皮肤的红外测温法不可靠,无法测量核心体温,尤其是在发热患者和手术室的患者中。测试的红外鼓膜体温计可用于临床实践;然而,应该注意操作的不同模式。