Suppr超能文献

经桡动脉入路行特发性左心室心动过速导管消融的可行性和安全性。

Feasibility and safety of transradial approach for catheter ablation of idiopathic left ventricular tachycardia.

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Cardiovascular Research Institute of Wuhan University, 238 Jiefang Road, Wuchang, Wuhan, 430060, People's Republic of China.

出版信息

Clin Res Cardiol. 2011 Jan;100(1):37-43. doi: 10.1007/s00392-010-0201-3. Epub 2010 Jul 21.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The feasibility and safety of the transradial approach for catheter ablation of idiopathic left ventricular tachycardia (ILVT) have not been evaluated. The aim of this study was to investigate the feasibility and safety of transradial approach for catheter ablation in ILVT patients.

METHODS

Thirty consecutive ILVT patients with negative Allen's test undergoing catheter ablation via transradial approach were enrolled to compare the safety and efficacy with 30 other ILVT patients who previously underwent catheter ablation via transfemoral approach.

RESULTS

Ablation was successfully performed in all patients. In the transradial group, the total procedural and the fluoroscopy time (42.8 ± 6.9 min and 9.7 ± 1.9 min, respectively) were significantly shorter when compared with transfemoral group (52.8 ± 8.4 min and 11.5 ± 2.1 min, respectively) (both P < 0.05). The two groups were similar in the number of current applications (4.1 ± 0.8 vs. 4.4 ± 1.1, P > 0.05), the power energy (47.3 ± 7.3 vs. 49.7 ± 6.9 W, P > 0.05), and the total duration of current application (110.3 ± 15.6 vs. 112.3 ± 16.5 s, P > 0.05), respectively. The duration of hospitalization in transradial group was shorter than that in transfemoral group (4.1 ± 0.9 vs. 5.8 ± 1.1 days, P < 0.05). During follow-up, there was no recurrence of tachycardia in all patients. One patient in transfemoral group developed access site complications while none occurred in the transradial group.

CONCLUSIONS

The transradial approach is feasible and safe for catheter ablation of ILVT.

摘要

背景

经桡动脉入路行特发性左室室性心动过速(ILVT)导管消融的可行性和安全性尚未得到评估。本研究旨在探讨经桡动脉入路行 ILVT 导管消融的可行性和安全性。

方法

连续纳入 30 例经桡动脉入路行 ILVT 导管消融且 Allen 试验阴性的患者,并与 30 例先前经股动脉入路行 ILVT 导管消融的患者进行比较。

结果

所有患者均成功消融。与股动脉组相比,桡动脉组的总手术时间(42.8±6.9 分钟)和透视时间(9.7±1.9 分钟)显著缩短(分别为 52.8±8.4 分钟和 11.5±2.1 分钟)(均 P<0.05)。两组的电流应用次数(4.1±0.8 次比 4.4±1.1 次,P>0.05)、功率能量(47.3±7.3 W 比 49.7±6.9 W,P>0.05)和电流应用总时间(110.3±15.6 秒比 112.3±16.5 秒,P>0.05)相似。桡动脉组的住院时间短于股动脉组(4.1±0.9 天比 5.8±1.1 天,P<0.05)。随访期间,所有患者均无心动过速复发。股动脉组 1 例患者发生入路部位并发症,而桡动脉组无患者发生。

结论

经桡动脉入路行 ILVT 导管消融是可行且安全的。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验