Department of Neuroscience, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, 7005, Trondheim, Norway.
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2010 Nov;152(11):1873-86. doi: 10.1007/s00701-010-0731-5. Epub 2010 Jul 21.
BACKGROUND: A number of tools, including intraoperative ultrasound, are reported to facilitate surgical resection of high-grade gliomas. However, results from selected surgical series do not necessarily reflect the effectiveness in common neurosurgical practice. Delineation of seemingly similar brain tumours vary in different ultrasound-guided operations, perhaps limiting usefulness in certain patients. METHODS: We explore and describe the results associated with use of the SonoWand system with intraoperative ultrasound in a population-based, unselected, high-grade glioma series. Surgeons filled out questionnaires about presumed extent of resection, use of ultrasound and ultrasound image quality just after surgery. We evaluate the impact of ultrasound image quality. We also explore the importance of patient selection for surgical results. RESULTS: Of 156 consecutive malignant glioma operations, 142 (91%) were resections whilst 14 (9%) were only biopsies. We achieved gross total resection (GTR) in 37% of all high-grade glioma resections, whilst worsening of functional status was seen in 13%. The risk of getting worse was significantly higher in reoperations, resections in eloquent locations, resections in cases with poor ultrasound image quality, resection when surgeons' resection grade estimates were inaccurate and in cases with surgery-related complications. Aiming for GTR, unifocality of lesion, non-eloquent location and medium or good ultrasound image quality were identified as independent factors associated with achieving GTR. CONCLUSION: We report good overall results, both in terms of resection grades and functional outcome in consecutive malignant glioma resections, in which intraoperative ultrasound was used in 95%. We observed a seeming dose-response relationship between ultrasound image quality and clinical and radiological results. This may suggest that better ultrasound facilitates better surgery. The study also clearly demonstrates that, in terms of surgical results, the selection of patients seems to be much more important than the selection of surgical tools.
背景:有许多工具,包括术中超声,据报道可以促进高级别脑肿瘤的手术切除。然而,来自精选手术系列的结果并不一定反映在普通神经外科实践中的有效性。在不同的超声引导手术中,看似相似的脑肿瘤的描绘存在差异,这可能会限制其在某些患者中的应用。
方法:我们在一个基于人群的、未经选择的高级别胶质瘤系列中探索并描述了使用 SonoWand 系统进行术中超声的相关结果。外科医生在手术后立即填写关于假定切除范围、使用超声和超声图像质量的问卷。我们评估了超声图像质量的影响。我们还探讨了患者选择对手术结果的重要性。
结果:在 156 例连续恶性胶质瘤手术中,142 例(91%)为切除术,14 例(9%)为仅活检。我们在所有高级别胶质瘤切除术中实现了大体全切除(GTR),但功能状态恶化的比例为 13%。在再次手术、在功能区进行的切除、在超声图像质量差的病例中进行的切除、外科医生切除等级估计不准确时进行的切除以及与手术相关的并发症发生时,病情恶化的风险显著增加。对于 GTR,病变的单一性、非功能区位置、中等或良好的超声图像质量被确定为与实现 GTR 相关的独立因素。
结论:我们报告了连续恶性胶质瘤切除术中使用术中超声 95%的情况下,在切除等级和功能结果方面均取得良好的总体结果。我们观察到超声图像质量与临床和影像学结果之间存在明显的剂量反应关系。这可能表明更好的超声有助于更好的手术。该研究还清楚地表明,就手术结果而言,患者的选择似乎比手术工具的选择更为重要。
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2010-7-21
Neurosurg Focus. 2013-2
Exploration (Beijing). 2024-5-16
Front Neurol. 2023-10-26
Front Neurosci. 2023-9-18
Acta Neurochir Suppl. 2023