Munkvold Bodil Karoline Ravn, Jakola Asgeir Store, Reinertsen Ingerid, Sagberg Lisa Millgård, Unsgård Geirmund, Solheim Ole
The Faculty of Medicine, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.
Department of Neurosurgery, St. Olav's University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway; Department of Neurosurgery, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden; Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Sahlgrenska Academy, Gothenburg, Sweden.
World Neurosurg. 2018 Jul;115:e129-e136. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.03.208. Epub 2018 Apr 6.
In glioma operations, we sought to analyze sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values of intraoperative 3-dimensional ultrasound (US) for detecting residual tumor compared with early postoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Factors possibly associated with radiologic complete resection were also explored.
One hundred forty-four operations for diffuse supratentorial gliomas were included prospectively in an unselected, population-based, single-institution series. Operating surgeons answered a questionnaire immediately after surgery, stating whether residual tumor was seen with US at the end of resection and rated US image quality (e.g., good, medium, poor). Extent of surgical resection was estimated from preoperative and postoperative MRI.
Overall specificity was 85% for "no tumor remnant" seen in US images at the end of resection compared with postoperative MRI findings. Sensitivity was 46%, but tumor remnants seen on MRI were usually small (median, 1.05 mL) in operations with false-negative US findings. Specificity was highest in low-grade glioma operations (94%) and lowest in patients who had undergone prior radiotherapy (50%). Smaller tumor volume and superficial location were factors significantly associated with gross total resection in a multivariable logistic regression analysis, whereas good ultrasound image quality did not reach statistical significance (P = 0.061).
The specificity of intraoperative US is good, but sensitivity for detecting the last milliliter is low compared with postoperative MRI. Tumor volume and tumor depth are the predictors of achieving gross total resection, although ultrasound image quality was not.
在胶质瘤手术中,我们试图分析术中三维超声(US)与术后早期磁共振成像(MRI)相比,检测残留肿瘤的敏感性、特异性和预测价值。还探讨了可能与影像学完全切除相关的因素。
前瞻性纳入了144例幕上弥漫性胶质瘤手术,该系列研究基于未选择的、以人群为基础的单机构数据。手术医生在术后立即回答一份问卷,说明在切除结束时超声是否发现残留肿瘤,并对超声图像质量进行评分(如好、中、差)。根据术前和术后MRI评估手术切除范围。
与术后MRI结果相比,切除结束时超声图像显示“无肿瘤残留”的总体特异性为85%。敏感性为46%,但在超声检查结果为假阴性的手术中,MRI上发现的肿瘤残留通常较小(中位数为1.05 mL)。特异性在低级别胶质瘤手术中最高(94%),在既往接受过放疗的患者中最低(50%)。在多变量逻辑回归分析中,较小的肿瘤体积和表浅位置是与全切除显著相关的因素,而良好的超声图像质量未达到统计学意义(P = 0.061)。
术中超声的特异性良好,但与术后MRI相比,检测最后一毫升残留肿瘤的敏感性较低。肿瘤体积和肿瘤深度是实现全切除的预测因素,尽管超声图像质量不是。