Suppr超能文献

台湾药品市场的价格管制、新进入者和信息冲击:基于 2001 年至 2004 年全国范围内的数据研究。

Price regulation, new entry, and information shock on pharmaceutical market in Taiwan: a nationwide data-based study from 2001 to 2004.

机构信息

Pharmaceutical Health Services Research Department, University of Maryland School of Pharmacy, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA.

出版信息

BMC Health Serv Res. 2010 Jul 25;10:218. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-10-218.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Using non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) as a case, we used Taiwan's National Health Insurance (NHI) database, to empirically explore the association between policy interventions (price regulation, new drug entry, and an information shock) and drug expenditures, utilization, and market structure between 2001 and 2004.

METHODS

All NSAIDs prescribed in ambulatory visits in the NHI system during our study period were included and aggregated quarterly. Segmented regression analysis for interrupted time series was used to examine the associations between two price regulations, two new drug entries (cyclooxygennase-2 inhibitors) and the rofecoxib safety signal and expenditures and utilization of all NSAIDs. Herfindahl index (HHI) was applied to further examine the association between these interventions and market structure of NSAIDs.

RESULTS

New entry was the only variable that was significantly correlated with changes of expenditures (positive change, p = 0.02) and market structure of the NSAIDs market in the NHI system. The correlation between price regulation (first price regulation, p = 0.62; second price regulation, p = 0.26) and information shock (p = 0.31) and drug expenditure were not statistically significant. There was no significant change in the prescribing volume of NSAIDs per rheumatoid arthritis (RA) or osteoarthritis (OA) ambulatory visit during the observational period. The market share of NSAIDs had also been largely substituted by these new drugs up to 50%, in a three-year period and resulted in a more concentrated market structure (HHI 0.17).

CONCLUSIONS

Our empirical study found that new drug entry was the main driving force behind escalating drug spending, especially by altering the market share.

摘要

背景

以非甾体抗炎药(NSAIDs)为例,我们利用台湾全民健康保险(NHI)数据库,实证探讨政策干预(价格管制、新药进入和信息冲击)与 2001 年至 2004 年间药物支出、利用和市场结构之间的关系。

方法

在我们的研究期间,NHI 系统中所有在门诊开具的 NSAIDs 均被包括在内,并按季度汇总。使用分段回归分析中断时间序列来检验两种价格管制、两种新药(环氧化酶-2 抑制剂)和罗非昔布安全信号与所有 NSAIDs 的支出和利用之间的关系。赫芬达尔指数(HHI)用于进一步检验这些干预措施与 NSAIDs 市场结构之间的关系。

结果

新进入是唯一一个与支出变化(正相关,p = 0.02)和 NHI 系统中 NSAIDs 市场结构变化相关的变量。价格管制(第一次价格管制,p = 0.62;第二次价格管制,p = 0.26)和信息冲击(p = 0.31)与药物支出之间的相关性没有统计学意义。在观察期内,每个类风湿关节炎(RA)或骨关节炎(OA)门诊就诊的 NSAIDs 处方量没有明显变化。在三年内,这些新药取代了 NSAIDs 的大部分市场份额,导致市场结构更加集中(HHI 为 0.17)。

结论

我们的实证研究发现,新药进入是推动药物支出上升的主要动力,尤其是通过改变市场份额。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/16db/2918598/5b9736d06c81/1472-6963-10-218-1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验