Chen Chi-Liang, Chen Likwang, Yang Wei-Chih
The Department of Accounting, The College of Business, Chung Yuan Christian University, Chung-Li City, Taoyuan County 320, Taiwan.
BMC Public Health. 2008 Apr 12;8:118. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-8-118.
Controlling the growth of pharmaceutical expenditures is a major global challenge. Promotion of generic drug prescriptions or use is gaining increased support. There are substantial contextual differences in international experiences of implementing pharmaceutical policies related to generic drugs. Reporting these experiences from varied perspectives can inform future policy making. This study describes an experience of Taiwan, where patients with chronic (long-term) conditions are usually managed in hospitals and drugs are provided in this setting with costs reimbursed through the National Health Insurance (NHI). It investigates the effects of Taiwan's reimbursement rate adjustment based on chemical generic grouping in 2001. This research also demonstrates the use of micro-level longitudinal data to generate policy-relevant information. The research can be used to improve efficiency of health care resource use.
We chose the three most-used classes of cardiovascular drugs for this investigation: beta blocking agents, calcium channel blockers mainly with vascular effects, and plain ACE inhibitors. For each drug class, we investigated changes in daily expense, consumption volume, and total expenditures from a pre-action period to a corresponding post-action period. We compared an exposure or "intervention" group of patients targeted by the action with a comparisonor "control" group of patients not targeted by the action. The data sources are a longitudinal database for 200,000 NHI enrolees, corresponding NHI registration data of health care facilities, and an archive recording all historical data on the reimbursement rates of drugs covered by the NHI. We adopted a fixed effects linear regression model to control for unobserved heterogeneity among patient-hospital groups. Additional descriptive statistics were applied to examine whether any inappropriate consumption of drugs in the three classes existed.
The daily drug expense significantly decreased from the pre-action period to the post-action period for the exposure group. The average magnitudes of the decreases for the three classes of drugs mentioned above were 14.8%, 5.8% and 5.8%, respectively. In contrast, there was no reduction for the comparison group. The number of days of the prescription increased significantly from the pre- to the post-action period for both exposure and comparison groups. The total expense also significantly increased for both patient groups. For the exposure group, the average magnitudes of the growth in the total expenditure for the three classes of drugs were 47.7%, 60.0% and 55.3%, respectively. For the comparison group, they were 91.6%, 91.6% and 63.2%, respectively. After the action, approximately 50% of patients obtained more than 180 days of prescription drugs for a six-month period.
The 2001 price adjustment action, based on generic grouping, significantly reduced the daily expense of each of the three classes of cardiovascular drugs. However, in response to this policy change, hospitals in Taiwan tended to greatly expand the volume of drugs prescribed for their regular patients. Consequently, the total expenditures for the three classes of drugs grew substantially after the action. These knock-on effects weakened the capability of the price adjustment action to control total pharmaceutical expenditures. This means that no saved resources were available for other health care uses. Such expansion of pharmaceutical consumption might also lead to inefficient use of the three drug classes: a large proportion of patients obtained more than one day of drugs per day in the post-action period, suggesting manipulation to increase reimbursement and offset price controls. We recommend that Taiwan's government use the NHI data to establish a monitoring system to detect inappropriate prescription patterns before implementing future policy changes. Such a monitoring system could then be used to deter hospitals from abusing their prescription volumes, making it possible to more effectively save health care resources by reducing drug reimbursement rates.
控制药品支出增长是一项重大的全球挑战。推广使用仿制药正获得越来越多的支持。在实施与仿制药相关的药品政策方面,国际经验存在很大的背景差异。从不同角度报告这些经验可为未来的政策制定提供参考。本研究描述了台湾的一个经验,台湾慢性病患者通常在医院接受治疗,药品在医院提供,费用通过国民健康保险(NHI)报销。该研究调查了2001年台湾基于化学仿制药分组进行报销率调整的效果。本研究还展示了如何使用微观层面的纵向数据来生成与政策相关的信息。该研究可用于提高医疗保健资源的使用效率。
我们选择了三类最常用的心血管药物进行此项调查:β受体阻滞剂、主要具有血管作用的钙通道阻滞剂以及普通ACE抑制剂。对于每类药物,我们调查了从行动前时期到相应行动后时期的每日费用、消费量和总支出的变化。我们将行动针对的暴露或“干预”组患者与未受行动影响的对照或“控制”组患者进行了比较。数据来源包括一个20万NHI参保人的纵向数据库、相应的医疗保健机构NHI登记数据以及一个记录NHI涵盖药物报销率所有历史数据的档案库。我们采用固定效应线性回归模型来控制患者 - 医院组之间未观察到的异质性。还应用了额外的描述性统计来检查这三类药物中是否存在任何不当用药情况。
暴露组的每日药品费用从行动前时期到行动后时期显著下降。上述三类药物的平均降幅分别为14.8%、5.8%和5.8%。相比之下,对照组没有下降。暴露组和对照组的处方天数从行动前到行动后时期均显著增加。两个患者组的总费用也均显著增加。对于暴露组,三类药物总支出的平均增长幅度分别为47.7%、60.0%和55.3%。对于对照组,分别为91.6%、91.6%和63.2%。行动后,约50%的患者在六个月内获得了超过180天的处方药。
2001年基于仿制药分组的价格调整行动显著降低了三类心血管药物中每类药物的每日费用。然而,为应对这一政策变化,台湾的医院倾向于大幅增加为其常规患者开具的药品数量。因此,行动后这三类药物的总支出大幅增长。这些连锁反应削弱了价格调整行动控制药品总支出的能力。这意味着没有节省出资源用于其他医疗保健用途。这种药品消费的扩张也可能导致这三类药物的低效使用:很大一部分患者在行动后时期每天获得的药品超过一天用量,这表明存在为增加报销额度和抵消价格控制而进行的操纵行为。我们建议台湾政府利用NHI数据建立一个监测系统,以便在实施未来政策变化之前检测到不当的处方模式。这样一个监测系统随后可用于阻止医院滥用其处方量,从而有可能通过降低药品报销率更有效地节省医疗保健资源。