Suppr超能文献

工作与颈痛:心理、社会和机械性危险因素的前瞻性研究。

Work and neck pain: a prospective study of psychological, social, and mechanical risk factors.

机构信息

The National Institute of Occupational Health, Norway Department of Psychology, University of Oslo, Norway.

出版信息

Pain. 2010 Oct;151(1):162-173. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2010.07.001. Epub 2010 Jul 23.

Abstract

To determine the impact of occupational psychological/social and mechanical factors on neck pain, a prospective cohort study with a follow-up period of 2 years was conducted with a sample of Norwegian employees. The following designs were tested: (i) cross-sectional analyses at baseline (n=4569) and follow-up (n=4122), (ii) prospective analyses with baseline predictors, (iii) prospective analyses with average exposure over time [(T1+T2)/2] as predictor, and (iv) prospective analyses with measures of change in exposure from T1 to T2 as predictors. A total of 2419 employees responded to both the baseline and follow-up questionnaire. Data were analyzed using ordinal logistic regression. After adjustment for age, sex, neck pain at T1, and other exposure factors that had been estimated to be confounders, the most consistent risk factors were role conflict (highest OR 2.97, 99% CI: 1.29-6.74) and working with arms raised to or above shoulder level (highest OR 1.37, 99% CI: 1.05-1.78). The most consistent protective factors were empowering leadership (lowest OR 0.53, 99% CI: 0.35-0.81) and decision control (lowest OR 0.60, 99% CI: 0.36-1.00). Hence, psychological and social factors are important precursors of neck pain, along with mechanical factors. Although traditional factors such as quantitative demands and decision control play a part in the etiology of neck pain at work, in this study several new factors emerged as more important.

摘要

为了确定职业心理/社会和机械因素对颈部疼痛的影响,对挪威员工进行了一项为期 2 年的前瞻性队列研究,随访期为 2 年。测试了以下设计:(i)基线(n=4569)和随访(n=4122)的横断面分析,(ii)具有基线预测因子的前瞻性分析,(iii)作为预测因子的随时间变化的平均暴露量[(T1+T2)/2]的前瞻性分析,以及(iv)作为预测因子的暴露量从 T1 到 T2 的变化测量的前瞻性分析。共有 2419 名员工对基线和随访问卷做出了回应。使用有序逻辑回归分析数据。调整年龄、性别、T1 时的颈部疼痛以及其他已估计为混杂因素的暴露因素后,最一致的危险因素是角色冲突(最高比值比 2.97,99%置信区间:1.29-6.74)和手臂抬高至肩部以上水平(最高比值比 1.37,99%置信区间:1.05-1.78)。最一致的保护因素是赋权领导(最低比值比 0.53,99%置信区间:0.35-0.81)和决策控制(最低比值比 0.60,99%置信区间:0.36-1.00)。因此,心理和社会因素与机械因素一样,是颈部疼痛的重要前驱因素。尽管定量需求和决策控制等传统因素在工作中的颈部疼痛病因学中发挥了作用,但在这项研究中,一些新的因素被认为更为重要。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验