Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Louisville, Louisville, Kentucky 40202, USA.
J Surg Educ. 2010 Mar-Apr;67(2):71-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2009.12.006.
To improve the understanding of relationships among United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE Step I), Orthopedic In-Training Examination (OITE), Subjective Clinical Performance Evaluations, and American Board of Orthopedic Surgery Examination Part I (Abos-I) and Part II (Abos-II), which would help residency programs better achieve their educational mission.
A 12-year descriptive study of retrospectively collected data.
One residency program with 47 resident participants.
Residents that failed Abos-I and Abos-II had lower program mean OITE year-in-training (YIT) percentile rank scores. The program mean OITE YIT percentile rank score had a moderate relationship with Abos-I (% correct) score (r = 0.68, p < 0.0001) and an insignificant relationship with USMLE Step I (3-digit) score (r = 0.22, p = 0.13). Residents with upper quartile (>or=220) USMLE Step I (3-digit) scores for our program had higher program mean OITE YIT percentile rank scores and Abos-I (% correct) scores than residents with lower quartile scores (<or=202). Residents who scored in the upper quartile (>or=55) for the program mean OITE YIT percentile rank score had higher Abos-I (% correct) scores than residents who did not. Residents who scored in the lower quartile for the third postgraduate year (PGY-3) program OITE YIT percentile rank score or for the program mean OITE YIT percentile rank score had a 5.2 and 5.8 time greater Abos-I failure risk, respectively. The program PGY-3 OITE YIT percentile rank score was the strongest Abos-I (% correct) score discriminator. Resident Abos-I (% correct), program mean OITE YIT, and program PGY-3 OITE YIT percentile rank scores were the strongest discriminators for Abos-II passage. Residents with a program mean OITE YIT percentile rank score >or=28, program PGY-3 OITE YIT percentile rank score >or=39, and USMLE Step I (3-digit) score >or=207 were more likely to pass Abos-I and II. Residents that had lower quartile USMLE Step I (3-digit) scores for our program had a 2.3 time greater Abos-I failure risk. Program residents with >or=2 below-average subjective clinical performance evaluations had lower Abos-I (% correct) scores but had similar Abos-I and II pass rates.
Our program uses the USMLE Step I (3-digit) score as a preacceptance estimate of likely supplemental guided mentoring needs. Program mean OITE YIT percentile rank and PGY-3 OITE YIT percentile rank scores help identify educational deficiencies and predict eventual Abos-I and II passage. Subjective clinical performance evaluations provide important supplemental information regarding professionalism, communication, and patient care skills.
增进对美国医师执照考试(USMLE 第 1 步)、骨科住院医师培训考试(OITE)、主观临床绩效评估以及美国骨科委员会考试第 1 部分(Abos-I)和第 2 部分(Abos-II)之间关系的理解,这将有助于住院医师培训计划更好地实现其教育使命。
对回顾性收集的数据进行了 12 年的描述性研究。
一个有 47 名住院医师参加的住院医师培训计划。
Abos-I 和 Abos-II 不及格的住院医师的培训计划平均 OITE 年度培训(YIT)百分位排名分数较低。培训计划平均 OITE YIT 百分位排名分数与 Abos-I(%正确)分数呈中度相关(r = 0.68,p < 0.0001),与 USMLE 第 1 步(3 位数)分数呈无显著相关(r = 0.22,p = 0.13)。我们培训计划中 USMLE 第 1 步(3 位数)分数处于较高四分位(>或=220)的住院医师,其培训计划平均 OITE YIT 百分位排名分数和 Abos-I(%正确)分数均高于分数较低的住院医师(<或=202)。在培训计划平均 OITE YIT 百分位排名分数中处于较高四分位(>或=55)的住院医师,其 Abos-I(%正确)分数高于未达到该分数的住院医师。在第 3 年(PGY-3)培训计划 OITE YIT 百分位排名分数或培训计划平均 OITE YIT 百分位排名分数中处于较低四分位的住院医师,Abos-I 不及格的风险分别增加了 5.2 倍和 5.8 倍。培训计划的 PGY-3 OITE YIT 百分位排名分数是 Abos-I(%正确)分数的最强判别器。住院医师的 Abos-I(%正确)、培训计划平均 OITE YIT 和培训计划 PGY-3 OITE YIT 百分位排名分数是 Abos-II 通过的最强判别器。具有培训计划平均 OITE YIT 百分位排名分数>或=28、培训计划 PGY-3 OITE YIT 百分位排名分数>或=39 和 USMLE 第 1 步(3 位数)分数>或=207 的住院医师更有可能通过 Abos-I 和 II。我们培训计划的 USMLE 第 1 步(3 位数)分数较低的住院医师 Abos-I 不及格的风险增加了 2.3 倍。低于平均水平的主观临床绩效评估次数>或=2 的住院医师的 Abos-I(%正确)分数较低,但 Abos-I 和 II 的通过率相似。
我们的培训计划将 USMLE 第 1 步(3 位数)分数作为接受补充指导需求的预先估计。培训计划平均 OITE YIT 百分位排名和 PGY-3 OITE YIT 百分位排名分数有助于识别教育缺陷,并预测最终的 Abos-I 和 II 通过情况。主观临床绩效评估提供了有关专业精神、沟通和患者护理技能的重要补充信息。