Faculdade de Odontologia, Universidade Federal do Amazonas, Manaus, Brasil.
Cad Saude Publica. 2010 Jun;26(6):1122-30. doi: 10.1590/s0102-311x2010000600006.
The objectives of this study were: (1) test the psychometric properties of OHIP-14 in a rural population; and (2) compare the oral health impacts in two riverine communities in the Brazilian Amazon that were living at different distances from an urban center. Data were obtained from a cross-sectional study in a consecutive sample (n = 126). The validity was assessed through the association of OHIP with clinical and subjective variables, which showed a more significant association with: pain, caries, need of extraction or endodontic treatment; than with tooth loss, periodontal disease or need of prostheses. The stability and internal consistency were good (ICC = 0.97; Cronbach's alpha = 0.89). The prevalence of oral impacts was greater in the community far from the urban center [70.3 (59.9-80.7)] than in the community closer to it [44.3 (30.7-57.7)], and in women [66.7 (56.0-77.3)] in comparison with men [49.1 (35.3-62.7)]. The OHIP-14 adapted to rural populations in Amazonas State was valid, reproducible, and consistent. There was high prevalence of impacts, especially for riverine communities that lived far from urban centers.
(1)在农村人群中测试 OHIP-14 的心理测量特性;(2)比较生活在距离城市中心不同距离的巴西亚马逊河两个河滨社区的口腔健康影响。数据来自一项连续样本的横断面研究(n=126)。通过 OHIP 与临床和主观变量的相关性来评估其有效性,结果表明其与疼痛、龋齿、拔牙或根管治疗的需求的相关性更显著,而与牙齿缺失、牙周病或需要修复体的相关性较低。稳定性和内部一致性良好(ICC=0.97;克朗巴赫α=0.89)。距离城市中心较远的社区(70.3%(59.9-80.7))的口腔影响发生率高于距离城市中心较近的社区(44.3%(30.7-57.7)),女性(66.7%(56.0-77.3))高于男性(49.1%(35.3-62.7))。OHIP-14 适用于亚马逊州的农村人群,具有有效性、可重复性和一致性。影响的发生率很高,特别是对于生活在远离城市中心的河滨社区。