Department of Internal Medicine, Cardiovascular Center, Nuclear Cardiology, University Hospital of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
J Nucl Cardiol. 2010 Dec;17(6):1023-33. doi: 10.1007/s12350-010-9272-9. Epub 2010 Jul 24.
The aim of this study was to determine whether epicardial structural disease may affect the manifestation of a longitudinal decrease in myocardial blood flow (MBF) or MBF difference during hyperemia in cardiovascular risk individuals, and its dependency on the flow increase.
In 54 cardiovascular risk individuals (at risk) and in 26 healthy controls, MBF was measured with (13)N-ammonia and PET/CT in mL/g/min at rest and during dipyridamole stimulation. Computed tomography coronary angiography (CTA) was performed using a 64-slice CT of a PET/CT system. Absolute MBFs during dipyridamole stimulation were mildly lower in the mid-distal than in the mid-LV myocardium in controls (2.20 ± .51 vs 2.29 ± .51, P < .0001), while it was more pronounced in at risk with normal and abnormal CTA (1.56 ± .42 vs 1.91 ± .46 and 1.18 ± .34 vs 1.51 ± .40 mL/g/min, respectively, P < .0001), resulting in a longitudinal MBF difference that was highest in at risk with normal CTA, intermediate in at risk abnormal CTA, and lowest in controls (.35 ± .16 and .22 ± .09 vs .09 ± .04 mL/g/min, respectively, P < .0001). On multivariate analysis, log-CCS and mid-LV hyperemic MBF increase, indicative of microvascular function, were independent predictors of the observed longitudinal MBF difference (P ≤ .004 by ANOVA).
Epicardial structural disease and microvascular function are important determinants of an abnormal longitudinal MBF difference as determined with PET/CT.
本研究旨在确定心外膜结构疾病是否会影响心血管风险个体在充血期间心肌血流(MBF)纵向减少或 MBF 差异的表现,以及其对血流增加的依赖性。
在 54 名心血管风险个体(风险组)和 26 名健康对照者中,使用(13)N-氨和 PET/CT 在休息和双嘧达莫刺激期间以 mL/g/min 测量 MBF。使用 PET/CT 系统的 64 层 CT 进行计算机断层扫描冠状动脉造影(CTA)。在对照组中,与中 LV 心肌相比,中远段心肌在双嘧达莫刺激期间的绝对 MBF 略低(2.20 ±.51 比 2.29 ±.51,P <.0001),而在风险组中更为明显,无论 CTA 是否正常和异常(1.56 ±.42 比 1.91 ±.46 和 1.18 ±.34 比 1.51 ±.40 mL/g/min,分别,P <.0001),导致在 CTA 正常的风险个体中 MBF 纵向差异最大,在 CTA 异常的风险个体中中等,在对照组中最低(分别为.35 ±.16 和.22 ±.09 比.09 ±.04 mL/g/min,P <.0001)。多元分析显示,log-CCS 和中 LV 充血性 MBF 增加,提示微血管功能,是观察到的纵向 MBF 差异的独立预测因素(通过 ANOVA,P ≤.004)。
心外膜结构疾病和微血管功能是 PET/CT 确定异常纵向 MBF 差异的重要决定因素。