• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

老年人言语听力测定分数、听力损失、年龄和认知能力的相关性分析。

Correlational analysis of speech audiometric scores, hearing loss, age, and cognitive abilities in the elderly.

作者信息

Jerger J, Jerger S, Pirozzolo F

机构信息

Department of Otorhinolaryngology & Communicative Sciences, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas.

出版信息

Ear Hear. 1991 Apr;12(2):103-9. doi: 10.1097/00003446-199104000-00004.

DOI:10.1097/00003446-199104000-00004
PMID:2065833
Abstract

A battery of speech audiometric measures and a battery of neuropsychological measures were administered to 200 elderly individuals with varying degrees of pure-tone sensitivity loss. Results were analyzed from the standpoint of the extent to which variation in speech audiometric scores could be predicted by knowledge of pure-tone hearing level, age, and cognitive status. For the four monotic test procedures (PB, SPIN-Low, SPIN-High, and SSI) degree of hearing loss bore the strongest relation to speech recognition score. Cognitive status accounted for little of the variance in any of these four speech audiometric scores. In the case of the single dichotic test procedure (DSI), both degree of hearing loss and speed of mental processing, as measured by the Digit Symbol subtest of the WAIS-R, accounted for significant variance. Finally, age accounted for significant unique variance only in the SSI score.

摘要

对200名有不同程度纯音听力损失的老年人进行了一系列言语听力测量和一系列神经心理学测量。从通过纯音听力水平、年龄和认知状态的信息来预测言语听力分数变化的程度这一角度对结果进行了分析。对于四种单耳测试程序(PB、SPIN - 低、SPIN - 高和SSI),听力损失程度与言语识别分数的关系最为密切。认知状态在这四种言语听力分数中的任何一种中所占的方差都很小。在单双耳测试程序(DSI)的情况下,听力损失程度和由韦氏成人智力量表修订版(WAIS - R)数字符号分测验所测量的心理加工速度都占显著方差。最后,年龄仅在SSI分数中占显著的独特方差。

相似文献

1
Correlational analysis of speech audiometric scores, hearing loss, age, and cognitive abilities in the elderly.老年人言语听力测定分数、听力损失、年龄和认知能力的相关性分析。
Ear Hear. 1991 Apr;12(2):103-9. doi: 10.1097/00003446-199104000-00004.
2
Can age-related decline in speech understanding be explained by peripheral hearing loss?与年龄相关的言语理解能力下降能由外周性听力损失来解释吗?
J Am Acad Audiol. 1992 Jan;3(1):33-8.
3
Speech-in-speech listening on the LiSN-S test by older adults with good audiograms depends on cognition and hearing acuity at high frequencies.听力图正常的老年人在LiSN-S测试中的言语中言语聆听能力取决于高频认知和听力敏锐度。
Ear Hear. 2015 Jan;36(1):24-41. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000096.
4
Decline of speech understanding and auditory thresholds in the elderly.老年人言语理解能力和听觉阈值的下降。
J Acoust Soc Am. 2005 Aug;118(2):1089-100. doi: 10.1121/1.1953207.
5
[A preliminary study on the correlation between auditory function and cognitive function in the elderly].[老年人听觉功能与认知功能相关性的初步研究]
Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2020 Jul;34(7):582-587. doi: 10.13201/j.issn.2096-7993.2020.07.002.
6
[Relation between pure tone audiometry and speech audiometry in various hearing-impaired listeners].[不同听力受损受试者纯音听力测试与言语听力测试之间的关系]
Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi. 1993;28(1):29-31, 59.
7
[Hearing handicap--an addition to audiometric hearing loss. Results of an exploratory study of auditory communication disorders in the elderly].[听力障碍——除听力计测听听力损失之外。老年人听觉交流障碍的一项探索性研究结果]
HNO. 1996 Jul;44(7):376-84.
8
Audiometric profile in presbycusis.老年性聋的听力图特征
Acta Otolaryngol Suppl. 1990;476:85-9; discussion 90. doi: 10.3109/00016489109127259.
9
Dichotic Digits Test Performance Across the Ages: Results From Two Large Epidemiologic Cohort Studies.不同年龄段的双耳数字测试表现:两项大型流行病学队列研究的结果
Ear Hear. 2017 May/Jun;38(3):314-320. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000386.
10
[Speech intelligibility in elderly hearing impaired people].[老年听力受损者的言语清晰度]
Adv Gerontol. 2016;29(4):663-669.

引用本文的文献

1
Auditory and cognitive contributions to recognition of degraded speech in noise: Individual differences among older adults.听觉和认知对噪声中退化语音识别的贡献:老年人的个体差异。
PLoS One. 2025 Sep 4;20(9):e0331487. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0331487. eCollection 2025.
2
Speech Perception in Older Adults: An Interplay of Hearing, Cognition, and Learning?老年人的言语感知:听力、认知与学习的相互作用?
Front Psychol. 2022 Feb 17;13:816864. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.816864. eCollection 2022.
3
The frontotemporal organization of the arcuate fasciculus and its relationship with speech perception in young and older amateur singers and non-singers.
弓状束的额颞组织及其与年轻和老年业余歌唱者和非歌唱者言语感知的关系。
Hum Brain Mapp. 2021 Jul;42(10):3058-3076. doi: 10.1002/hbm.25416. Epub 2021 Apr 9.
4
The Role of Cognition in Common Measures of Peripheral Synaptopathy and Hidden Hearing Loss.认知在外周突触病变和隐匿性听力损失常用测量方法中的作用。
Am J Audiol. 2019 Dec 16;28(4):843-856. doi: 10.1044/2019_AJA-19-0063. Epub 2019 Oct 24.
5
Verbal task and motor responses (VTMR) in an adult hearing screening programme.成人听力筛查项目中的言语任务与运动反应(VTMR)
Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2020 Feb;40(1):57-63. doi: 10.14639/0392-100X-1929. Epub 2019 Mar 25.
6
Nonverbal Reasoning as a Contributor to Sentence Recognition Outcomes in Adults With Cochlear Implants.非言语推理对人工耳蜗植入成人句子识别结果的影响
Otol Neurotol. 2018 Dec;39(10):e956-e963. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000001998.
7
Age-Related Differences in the Effects of Masker Cuing on Releasing Chinese Speech From Informational Masking.掩蔽提示对从信息掩蔽中释放中文语音的影响的年龄相关差异
Front Psychol. 2018 Oct 9;9:1922. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01922. eCollection 2018.
8
How does aging affect recognition of spectrally degraded speech?衰老如何影响对频谱退化语音的识别?
Laryngoscope. 2018 Nov;128 Suppl 5(Suppl 5). doi: 10.1002/lary.27457. Epub 2018 Oct 16.
9
Hearing in Real-Life Environments (HERE): Structure and Reliability of a Questionnaire on Perceived Hearing for Older Adults.现实生活环境中的听力(HERE):老年人感知听力问卷的结构和可靠性。
Ear Hear. 2019 Mar/Apr;40(2):368-380. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000622.
10
Impact of Aging on the Auditory System and Related Cognitive Functions: A Narrative Review.衰老对听觉系统及相关认知功能的影响:一篇叙述性综述。
Front Neurosci. 2018 Mar 5;12:125. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2018.00125. eCollection 2018.