Meijer G A, Westerterp K R, Verhoeven F M, Koper H B, ten Hoor F
Department of Human Biology, University of Limburg, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 1991 Mar;38(3):221-9. doi: 10.1109/10.133202.
Motion sensors may be applied for the assessment of physical activity. This paper reviews the evolution of these instruments from the mechanical pedometer to the electronic accelerometer. We conclude that for accurate assessment of physical activity under free living conditions the recently introduced accelerometer looks most promising, although little information was available regarding the reliability of these instruments. Subsequently, reliability of an accelerometer with a three-directional sensor was examined. Intrainstrument variation in a bench test was less than 8% during four measurements over a week. Interinstrument variation during treadmill experiments while subjects wore two accelerometers at the same time was on average 22% and was not improved after adjustment for differences found in the bench test. Reproducibility in the treadmill experiment was approximately 76, 85, and 95% at 3, 5, and 7 km/h, respectively. Bench testing revealed that the sensitivity of a piezoelectric element is prone to shifts, probably due to mechanical, electromagnetic, and/or temperature shock, which may be encountered during outdoor application. However, the relevance of the bench test in this study may be questioned, as results did not correspond with the findings in subjects. This needs further investigation.
运动传感器可用于身体活动的评估。本文回顾了这些仪器从机械计步器到电子加速度计的发展历程。我们得出结论,对于在自由生活条件下准确评估身体活动,最近推出的加速度计看起来最有前景,尽管关于这些仪器的可靠性的信息很少。随后,对具有三向传感器的加速度计的可靠性进行了研究。在一周内进行的四次测量中,台架试验中仪器内部的变化小于8%。在跑步机实验中,受试者同时佩戴两个加速度计时,仪器间的平均变化为22%,在对台架试验中发现的差异进行调整后并没有改善。在跑步机实验中,在3、5和7公里/小时的速度下,再现性分别约为76%、85%和95%。台架试验表明,压电元件的灵敏度容易发生偏移,这可能是由于在户外应用中可能遇到的机械、电磁和/或温度冲击。然而,本研究中台架试验的相关性可能受到质疑,因为结果与受试者的发现不一致。这需要进一步研究。