• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

台湾地区冠状动脉旁路移植术的外科医生和医院量作为质量指标:检验死亡率风险并考虑未观察到的异质性。

Surgeon and hospital volume as quality indicators for CABG in Taiwan: examining hazard to mortality and accounting for unobserved heterogeneity.

机构信息

Department of Health Management and Policy, University of Iowa College of Public Health, 200 Hawkins Dr. E206, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA.

出版信息

Health Serv Res. 2010 Oct;45(5 Pt 1):1168-87. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2010.01137.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1475-6773.2010.01137.x
PMID:20662948
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2965499/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To investigate whether provider volume has an impact on the hazard of mortality for coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) patients in Taiwan.

DATA SOURCES/STUDY SETTING: Multiple sources of linked data from the National Health Insurance Program in Taiwan.

STUDY DESIGN

The linked data were used to identify 27,463 patients who underwent CABG without concomitant angioplasty or valve procedures and the surgeon and hospital volumes. Generalized estimating equations and hazard models were estimated to assess the impact of volume on mortality. The hazard modeling technique used accounts for bias stemming from unobserved heterogeneity.

PRINCIPAL FINDINGS

Both surgeon and hospital volume quartiles are inversely related to the hazard of mortality after CABG. Patients whose surgeon is in the three higher volume quartiles have lower 1-, 3-, 6-, and 12-month mortality after CABG, while only those having their procedure performed at the highest quartile of volume hospitals have lower mortality outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Mortality outcomes are related to provider CABG volume in Taiwan. Unobserved heterogeneity is a concern in the volume-outcome relationship; after accounting for it, surgeon volume effects on short-term mortality are large. Using models controlling for unobserved heterogeneity and examining longer term mortality may still differentiate provider quality by volume.

摘要

目的

探讨在台湾,医师手术量对冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)患者死亡风险的影响。

资料来源/研究场所:来自台湾全民健康保险计划的多个数据源的链接数据。

研究设计

利用链接数据确定了 27463 例未同时行血管成形术或瓣膜手术的 CABG 患者以及外科医师和医院的手术量。采用广义估计方程和风险模型来评估容量对死亡率的影响。所使用的风险建模技术可以解决因未观察到的异质性而产生的偏差。

主要发现

外科医师和医院的手术量四分位数与 CABG 后死亡率的风险呈反比。外科医师手术量处于较高四分位数的患者在 CABG 后 1、3、6 和 12 个月的死亡率较低,而只有在手术量最高四分位数的医院接受手术的患者死亡率才较低。

结论

在台湾,死亡率与医师 CABG 手术量相关。在容量-结果关系中存在未观察到的异质性;在对其进行解释后,外科医师的短期死亡率与容量之间的关系影响较大。使用控制未观察到的异质性并检查更长期死亡率的模型可能仍然可以根据容量来区分提供者的质量。

相似文献

1
Surgeon and hospital volume as quality indicators for CABG in Taiwan: examining hazard to mortality and accounting for unobserved heterogeneity.台湾地区冠状动脉旁路移植术的外科医生和医院量作为质量指标:检验死亡率风险并考虑未观察到的异质性。
Health Serv Res. 2010 Oct;45(5 Pt 1):1168-87. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2010.01137.x.
2
The "occasional open heart surgeon" revisited.再谈“偶尔操刀的心脏外科医生”。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2008 Jun;135(6):1254-60. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2007.10.077.
3
Optimal surgeon and hospital volume thresholds to reduce mortality and length of stay for CABG.优化外科医生和医院手术量阈值,以降低 CABG 的死亡率和住院时间。
PLoS One. 2021 Apr 14;16(4):e0249750. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0249750. eCollection 2021.
4
Procedural volume as a marker of quality for CABG surgery.冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)手术的操作量作为质量指标。
JAMA. 2004 Jan 14;291(2):195-201. doi: 10.1001/jama.291.2.195.
5
Provider-hospital "fit" and patient outcomes: evidence from Massachusetts cardiac surgeons, 2002-2004.医疗机构与医院的“适配”和患者的治疗效果:来自 2002-2004 年马萨诸塞州心脏外科医生的证据。
Health Serv Res. 2011 Feb;46(1 Pt 1):1-26. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2010.01169.x. Epub 2010 Sep 17.
6
Association of case volume with mortality of chinese patients after coronary artery bypass grafting: Taiwan experience.冠状动脉搭桥术后中国患者病例数量与死亡率的关联:台湾地区经验
Circ J. 2005 Nov;69(11):1327-32. doi: 10.1253/circj.69.1327.
7
U.S. trends in CABG hospital volume: the effect of adding cardiac surgery programs.美国冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)医院手术量趋势:新增心脏外科项目的影响。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2007 Jan-Feb;26(1):162-8. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.26.1.162.
8
Coronary angioplasty volume-outcome relationships for hospitals and cardiologists.医院和心脏病专家的冠状动脉血管成形术数量与治疗结果的关系。
JAMA. 1997 Mar 19;277(11):892-8.
9
The CABG surgery volume-outcome relationship: temporal trends and selection effects in California, 1998-2004.冠状动脉搭桥手术的手术量-预后关系:1998 - 2004年加利福尼亚州的时间趋势及选择效应
Health Serv Res. 2008 Feb;43(1 Pt 1):174-92. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2007.00740.x.
10
Early efficacy of CABG care delivery in a low procedure-volume community hospital: operative and midterm results.低手术量社区医院冠状动脉旁路移植术护理的早期疗效:手术及中期结果
BMC Surg. 2005 May 2;5:10. doi: 10.1186/1471-2482-5-10.

引用本文的文献

1
Volume creates value: The volume-outcome relationship in Scandinavian obesity surgery.量创造价值:斯堪的纳维亚肥胖手术中的量效关系。
Health Serv Manage Res. 2022 Nov;35(4):229-239. doi: 10.1177/09514848211048598. Epub 2022 Feb 6.
2
Optimal surgeon and hospital volume thresholds to reduce mortality and length of stay for CABG.优化外科医生和医院手术量阈值,以降低 CABG 的死亡率和住院时间。
PLoS One. 2021 Apr 14;16(4):e0249750. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0249750. eCollection 2021.
3
Do informed consumers in Taiwan favour larger hospitals? A 10-year population-based study on differences in the selection of healthcare providers among medical professionals, their relatives and the general population.台湾知情消费者是否更喜欢大型医院?一项基于 10 年的人群研究,探讨了医疗专业人员、其亲属和普通人群在医疗服务提供者选择方面的差异。
BMJ Open. 2019 May 16;9(5):e025202. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025202.
4
Preoperative factors affecting cost and length of stay for isolated off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting: hierarchical linear model analysis.影响单纯非体外循环冠状动脉搭桥术成本和住院时间的术前因素:分层线性模型分析
BMJ Open. 2015 Nov 17;5(11):e008750. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008750.
5
Do low-income coronary artery bypass surgery patients have equal opportunity to access excellent quality of care and enjoy good outcome in Taiwan?在台湾,低收入冠状动脉搭桥手术患者是否有平等机会获得优质医疗服务并取得良好治疗效果?
Int J Equity Health. 2014 Sep 10;13:64. doi: 10.1186/s12939-014-0064-8.

本文引用的文献

1
Evolution of the surgeon-volume, patient-outcome relationship.外科医生手术量与患者治疗结果关系的演变
Ann Surg. 2009 Jul;250(1):159-65. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181a77cb3.
2
Forgetting the learning curve for a moment: how much performance is unrelated to own experience?暂时先不考虑学习曲线:有多少表现与个人经验无关?
Health Econ. 2009 Jul;18(7):855-62. doi: 10.1002/hec.1412.
3
Learning, forgetting, and hospital quality: an empirical analysis of cardiac procedures in Maryland and Arizona.学习、遗忘与医院质量:对马里兰州和亚利桑那州心脏手术的实证分析
Health Econ. 2009 Jun;18(6):697-711. doi: 10.1002/hec.1400.
4
Volume-outcome relationship for coronary artery bypass grafting in an era of decreasing volume.在手术量下降时代冠状动脉搭桥术的手术量-预后关系
Arch Surg. 2008 Apr;143(4):338-44; discussion 344. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.143.4.338.
5
The CABG surgery volume-outcome relationship: temporal trends and selection effects in California, 1998-2004.冠状动脉搭桥手术的手术量-预后关系:1998 - 2004年加利福尼亚州的时间趋势及选择效应
Health Serv Res. 2008 Feb;43(1 Pt 1):174-92. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2007.00740.x.
6
Properties of analysis methods that account for clustering in volume-outcome studies when the primary predictor is cluster size.当主要预测因素是聚类大小时,在体积-结果研究中考虑聚类的分析方法的属性。
Stat Med. 2007 Apr 30;26(9):2017-35. doi: 10.1002/sim.2657.
7
Overcoming bias in estimating the volume-outcome relationship.克服在评估体积-结果关系时的偏差。
Health Serv Res. 2006 Feb;41(1):252-64. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2005.00461.x.
8
Controlling for patient risk in volume-outcome studies.在容量-结局研究中控制患者风险。
Arch Intern Med. 2005 Jul 25;165(14):1664; author reply 1664. doi: 10.1001/archinte.165.14.1664-a.
9
Predicting risk-adjusted mortality for CABG surgery: logistic versus hierarchical logistic models.预测冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)手术的风险调整死亡率:逻辑回归模型与分层逻辑回归模型
Med Care. 2005 Jul;43(7):726-35. doi: 10.1097/01.mlr.0000167802.27044.44.
10
Potential benefits of the new Leapfrog standards: effect of process and outcomes measures.新的“跳蛙”标准的潜在益处:过程与结果指标的影响
Surgery. 2004 Jun;135(6):569-75. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2004.03.004.