Psychology Department, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455-0344, USA.
J Pers. 2010 Oct;78(5):1437-68. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2010.00657.x. Epub 2010 Jul 20.
Individual differences in empathic accuracy (EA) can be assessed using daily diary methods as a complement to more commonly used lab-based behavioral observations. Using electronic dyadic diaries, we distinguished among elements of EA (i.e., accuracy in levels, scatter, and pattern, regarding both positive and negative moods) and examined them as phenomena at both the day and the person level. In a 3-week diary study of cohabiting partners, we found support for differentiating these elements. The proposed indices reflect differing aspects of accuracy, with considerable similarity among same-valenced accuracy indices. Overall there was greater accuracy regarding negative target moods than positive target moods. These methods and findings take the phenomenon of "everyday mindreading" (Ickes, 2003) into everyday life. We conclude by discussing empathic accuracies as a family of capacities for, or tendencies toward, accurate interpersonal sensitivity. Members of this family may have distinct associations with the perceiver's, target's, and relationship's well-being.
个体在同理心准确性(empathic accuracy,简称 EA)方面存在差异,可以通过日常日记的方法进行评估,作为对更常用的基于实验室的行为观察的补充。我们使用电子对偶日记,区分了同理心准确性的各个要素(即,对积极和消极情绪的水平、离散度和模式的准确性),并将其作为日间和个体层面的现象进行了研究。在一项为期 3 周的同居伴侣日记研究中,我们发现支持区分这些要素的证据。所提出的指数反映了准确性的不同方面,同值准确性指数之间具有相当大的相似性。总体而言,对于负面目标情绪的准确性要高于对正面目标情绪的准确性。这些方法和发现将“日常读心术”(Ickes,2003)的现象带入了日常生活。最后,我们讨论了同理心准确性作为一种准确人际敏感性的能力或倾向的家族。这个家族的成员可能与感知者、目标和关系的幸福感有明显的关联。