Tubiana M
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 1991;117(4):275-89. doi: 10.1007/BF01630709.
From 1950 to 1985 the 5-year survival rate of cancer patients in industrialized countries, has slowly increased from 25% in 1950 to 50% in 1985. This progress has been due to earlier diagnosis and to a gradual improvement of treatment modalities. Clinical needs have stimulated basic research and clinical investigation. In turn, biological research has introduced new concepts and new agents. Clinical investigation and applied research have brought about an improvement in therapeutic methods and a better understanding of the growth and progression of human cancers which has, in particular, led to the concept of adjuvant treatment of occult metastases. The major recent breakthroughs in fundamental research have reinforced the value of close cooperation between clinicians and fundamentalists. Most of the new biologic tools are specific and only active on tumors cells with well-defined characteristics. Furthermore some new techniques such as adoptive immunotherapy can induce complete tumor regression in some patients and have no detectable effects in other patients with apparently similar tumors. Some cytokines have different effects on experimental and human tumors. The cytokine network is so complex that the administration of one of them can induce unpredictable effects. It has been recognized that experimental tumors and in vitro studies can be misleading and there is no substitute for clinical studies on patients. Moreover clinical experience has documented the amazing ability of tumors to become resistant to all these new agents. Numerous new therapeutic methods are being explored, however with the current state of knowledge it appears that although they can help to control tumors, they still fail to eradicate them. We must therefore learn how to integrate them with conventional therapies. Advances in therapy shall be achieved only by well-designed clinical trials. Thus at the interface between fundamental research and clinical practice there is an urgent need for oncologists with a strong scientific background and laboratory scientists with a deep interest in clinical investigations.
从1950年到1985年,工业化国家癌症患者的5年生存率从1950年的25%缓慢上升至1985年的50%。这一进展得益于早期诊断以及治疗方式的逐步改进。临床需求推动了基础研究和临床调查。反过来,生物学研究引入了新的概念和新的药物。临床调查和应用研究带来了治疗方法的改进以及对人类癌症生长和进展的更好理解,这尤其促成了隐匿性转移辅助治疗的概念。基础研究中近期的重大突破强化了临床医生和基础研究人员密切合作的价值。大多数新的生物学工具具有特异性,仅对具有明确特征的肿瘤细胞有活性。此外,一些新技术,如过继性免疫疗法,在一些患者中可诱导肿瘤完全消退,而在其他具有明显相似肿瘤的患者中却没有可检测到的效果。一些细胞因子对实验性肿瘤和人类肿瘤有不同的作用。细胞因子网络非常复杂,以至于给予其中一种细胞因子可能会产生不可预测的效果。人们已经认识到实验性肿瘤和体外研究可能会产生误导,没有什么能替代对患者的临床研究。此外,临床经验证明肿瘤对所有这些新药物产生耐药性的能力惊人。目前正在探索众多新的治疗方法,然而就目前的知识水平而言,尽管它们有助于控制肿瘤,但似乎仍无法根除肿瘤。因此,我们必须学会如何将它们与传统疗法相结合。只有通过精心设计的临床试验才能实现治疗方面的进展。因此,在基础研究和临床实践的交叉点上,迫切需要具有强大科学背景的肿瘤学家和对临床调查有浓厚兴趣的实验室科学家。