• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Prize-based contingency management is efficacious in cocaine-abusing patients with and without recent gambling participation.有奖性应急实物强化对有近期赌博参与和无近期赌博参与的可卡因滥用患者均有效。
J Subst Abuse Treat. 2010 Oct;39(3):282-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2010.06.011. Epub 2010 Jul 29.
2
Prize-based contingency management does not increase gambling.基于奖励的权变管理不会增加赌博行为。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2006 Jul 27;83(3):269-73. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2005.11.023. Epub 2006 Jan 10.
3
Prize reinforcement contingency management for treating cocaine users: how low can we go, and with whom?用于治疗可卡因使用者的奖励强化应急管理:我们能将条件设置到多低,以及针对哪些人?
Addiction. 2004 Mar;99(3):349-60. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2003.00642.x.
4
Contingency management is efficacious and improves outcomes in cocaine patients with pretreatment marijuana use.应急管理在可卡因患者中有疗效,可以改善有治疗前大麻使用的患者的结局。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2011 Oct 1;118(1):62-7. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2011.03.001. Epub 2011 Mar 26.
5
Standard magnitude prize reinforcers can be as efficacious as larger magnitude reinforcers in cocaine-dependent methadone patients.标准强度的奖赏强化物在可卡因依赖的美沙酮患者中,可能与更大强度的强化物一样有效。
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2015 Jun;83(3):464-72. doi: 10.1037/a0037888. Epub 2014 Sep 8.
6
Amount of earnings during prize contingency management treatment is associated with posttreatment abstinence outcomes.在奖品应急管理治疗期间的收入金额与治疗后的戒断结果有关。
Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2011 Dec;19(6):445-50. doi: 10.1037/a0024261. Epub 2011 Jun 27.
7
A randomized, controlled trial of combined cognitive-behavioral therapy plus prize-based contingency management for cocaine dependence.一项针对可卡因依赖的联合认知行为疗法加基于奖励的应急管理的随机对照试验。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2014 Dec 1;145:94-100. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2014.09.785. Epub 2014 Oct 16.
8
Effect of reinforcement probability and prize size on cocaine and heroin abstinence in prize-based contingency management.强化概率和奖励大小对基于奖励的应急管理中可卡因和海洛因戒断的影响。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2008 Winter;41(4):539-49. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2008.41-539.
9
The cost-effectiveness of prize-based and voucher-based contingency management in a population of cocaine- or opioid-dependent outpatients.基于奖励和代金券的应急管理在可卡因或阿片类药物依赖门诊患者群体中的成本效益。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2009 Jun 1;102(1-3):108-15. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2009.02.005. Epub 2009 Mar 25.
10
Contingency management is efficacious for cocaine abusers with prior treatment attempts.应急管理对曾尝试过治疗的可卡因滥用者有效。
Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2008 Dec;16(6):547-54. doi: 10.1037/a0014042.

引用本文的文献

1
Unpredictable Drug Access and its Relevance for Substance Use Disorders: A Critical Review.不可预测的药物获取及其与物质使用障碍的相关性:一项批判性综述。
Perspect Behav Sci. 2025 Jun 2;48(2):367-387. doi: 10.1007/s40614-025-00449-1. eCollection 2025 Jun.
2
Implementing an evidence-based prize contingency management protocol for stimulant use.实施基于证据的兴奋剂使用奖酬管理方案。
J Subst Use Addict Treat. 2023 Aug;151:209079. doi: 10.1016/j.josat.2023.209079. Epub 2023 May 24.
3
What are the ethical implications of using prize-based contingency management in substance use? A scoping review.基于奖励的物质使用偶然性管理的伦理问题:范围综述。
Harm Reduct J. 2021 Aug 4;18(1):82. doi: 10.1186/s12954-021-00529-w.
4
"I's" on the prize: A systematic review of individual differences in Contingency Management treatment response.奖项中的“我因素”:对权变管理治疗反应个体差异的系统评价
J Subst Abuse Treat. 2019 May;100:64-83. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2019.03.001. Epub 2019 Mar 7.
5
Objective continuous monitoring of alcohol consumption for three months among alcohol use disorder treatment outpatients.目的:对酒精使用障碍治疗门诊患者进行为期三个月的酒精摄入量的连续监测。
Alcohol. 2019 Dec;81:131-138. doi: 10.1016/j.alcohol.2019.01.008. Epub 2019 Jan 31.
6
A randomized trial of contingency management reinforcing attendance at treatment: Do duration and timing of reinforcement matter?一项基于权变管理强化治疗参与的随机试验:强化的时长和时机是否重要?
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2018 Oct;86(10):799-809. doi: 10.1037/ccp0000330.
7
Experiences with SCRAMx alcohol monitoring technology in 100 alcohol treatment outpatients.100名酒精治疗门诊患者使用SCRAMx酒精监测技术的经验。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2017 Sep 1;178:417-424. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2017.05.031. Epub 2017 Jun 28.
8
Choice between variable and fixed cocaine injections in male rhesus monkeys.雄性恒河猴在可变剂量与固定剂量可卡因注射之间的选择。
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2017 Aug;234(15):2353-2364. doi: 10.1007/s00213-017-4659-9. Epub 2017 Jun 10.
9
Cocaine-using substance abuse treatment patients with and without HIV respond well to contingency management treatment.使用可卡因的药物滥用治疗患者,无论有无感染艾滋病毒,对权变管理治疗反应良好。
J Subst Abuse Treat. 2017 Jun;77:21-25. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2017.03.001. Epub 2017 Mar 9.
10
Depressive symptoms affect changes in nicotine withdrawal and smoking urges throughout smoking cessation treatment: Preliminary results.抑郁症状在整个戒烟治疗过程中影响尼古丁戒断及吸烟冲动的变化:初步结果。
Addict Res Theory. 2016;24(1):48-53. doi: 10.3109/16066359.2015.1060967. Epub 2015 Jun 26.

本文引用的文献

1
Group-based randomized trial of contingencies for health and abstinence in HIV patients.基于群组的随机试验,针对 HIV 患者的健康和戒断进行激励。
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2010 Feb;78(1):89-97. doi: 10.1037/a0016778.
2
Contingency management promotes smoking reductions in residential substance abuse patients.应急管理可促进住院药物滥用患者减少吸烟。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2008 Winter;41(4):617-22. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2008.41-617.
3
Randomized trial comparing two treatment strategies using prize-based reinforcement of abstinence in cocaine and opiate users.一项随机试验,比较两种使用基于奖励的戒断强化措施的治疗策略在可卡因和阿片类药物使用者中的效果。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2008 Winter;41(4):551-63. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2008.41-551.
4
Contingency management for attendance to group substance abuse treatment administered by clinicians in community clinics.社区诊所临床医生对参加团体药物滥用治疗的应急管理。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2008 Winter;41(4):517-26. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2008.41-517.
5
Serious adverse events in randomized psychosocial treatment studies: safety or arbitrary edicts?随机心理社会治疗研究中的严重不良事件:是安全性问题还是随意的指令?
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2008 Dec;76(6):1076-82. doi: 10.1037/a0013679.
6
The relationship between recreational gambling and substance abuse/dependence: data from a nationally representative sample.娱乐性赌博与物质滥用/依赖之间的关系:来自全国代表性样本的数据。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2009 Feb 1;100(1-2):164-8. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2008.09.011. Epub 2008 Nov 20.
7
DSM-IV pathological gambling in the National Comorbidity Survey Replication.《美国国立共病调查复制版》中的《精神疾病诊断与统计手册第四版》病理性赌博
Psychol Med. 2008 Sep;38(9):1351-60. doi: 10.1017/S0033291708002900. Epub 2008 Feb 7.
8
Mental health of non-gamblers versus "normal" gamblers among American Indian veterans: a community survey.美国印第安退伍军人中不赌博者与“正常”赌博者的心理健康状况:一项社区调查。
J Gambl Stud. 2008 Jun;24(2):193-205. doi: 10.1007/s10899-007-9084-2. Epub 2008 Jan 17.
9
A meta-analytic review of psychosocial interventions for substance use disorders.对物质使用障碍的心理社会干预措施的荟萃分析综述。
Am J Psychiatry. 2008 Feb;165(2):179-87. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2007.06111851. Epub 2008 Jan 15.
10
Randomized trial of contingent prizes versus vouchers in cocaine-using methadone patients.可卡因成瘾的美沙酮患者中,应急奖励与代金券对比的随机试验。
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2007 Dec;75(6):983-91. doi: 10.1037/0022-006X.75.6.983.

有奖性应急实物强化对有近期赌博参与和无近期赌博参与的可卡因滥用患者均有效。

Prize-based contingency management is efficacious in cocaine-abusing patients with and without recent gambling participation.

机构信息

Calhoun Cardiology Center, Department of Medicine, University of Connecticut Health Center MC-3944, 263 Farmington Avenue, Farmington, CT 06030-3944, USA.

出版信息

J Subst Abuse Treat. 2010 Oct;39(3):282-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2010.06.011. Epub 2010 Jul 29.

DOI:10.1016/j.jsat.2010.06.011
PMID:20667679
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2937065/
Abstract

Prize-based contingency management (CM) is efficacious in treating cocaine abuse, and the chance-based procedures of prize CM may be appealing to those who gamble. Using data from three randomized trials, we evaluated whether cocaine-abusing patients who had wagered in the month before treatment (n = 62) responded more favorably to prize CM than those who had not (n = 278). Participants were randomized to standard care (SC) or SC plus prize CM. Although prize CM was related to better outcomes overall, recent gambling was not associated with outcomes across or within treatment conditions. Gambling participation before treatment entry was associated with reductions in gambling over time, and this effect was more pronounced among those assigned to CM. These data suggest that prize CM is equally efficacious for substance-abusing patients who do and do not gamble, and they extend prior studies indicating that prize CM does not increase gambling.

摘要

基于奖励的随机对照试验(CM)对治疗可卡因滥用有效,而 CM 的随机奖励程序可能对那些有赌博倾向的人有吸引力。本研究使用三项随机试验的数据,评估了在治疗前一个月有过赌博行为(n = 62)的可卡因滥用患者是否比没有赌博行为的患者(n = 278)对基于奖励的 CM 治疗反应更好。参与者被随机分配到标准护理(SC)或 SC 加基于奖励的 CM。尽管基于奖励的 CM 总体上与更好的结果相关,但最近的赌博与治疗条件内或跨治疗条件的结果无关。治疗前的赌博参与与随时间的减少有关,而在被分配到 CM 的人群中,这种效果更为明显。这些数据表明,基于奖励的 CM 对有赌博和不赌博的物质滥用患者同样有效,并扩展了先前的研究,表明基于奖励的 CM 不会增加赌博。