Suppr超能文献

在奖品应急管理治疗期间的收入金额与治疗后的戒断结果有关。

Amount of earnings during prize contingency management treatment is associated with posttreatment abstinence outcomes.

机构信息

Calhoun Cardiology Center, University of Connecticut School of Medicine, Farmington, CT 06030-3944, USA.

出版信息

Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2011 Dec;19(6):445-50. doi: 10.1037/a0024261. Epub 2011 Jun 27.

Abstract

Contingency management (CM) treatments that provide patients with the opportunity to earn chances of winning prizes of varying magnitudes are becoming increasingly popular. In the CM literature, magnitude of reinforcement is linked with effect sizes, such that CM treatments that provide larger magnitude reinforcement are more efficacious than those that provide lower magnitude reinforcement. With prize CM, even when magnitudes of overall expected prize earnings are constant, some patients win more prizes than others. Thus, patients who win larger overall amounts of prizes during treatment may have better outcomes than those who win fewer prizes. This study evaluated the impact of overall amounts of prizes won on long-term abstinence outcomes. The dollar amount of prizes won during prize CM treatments was determined from 78 cocaine-abusing methadone-maintenance patients who were randomized to prize CM treatments in three clinical trials. Abstinence three months following the end of the CM intervention was the primary dependent variable. The dollar amount of prizes won during CM treatment was a significant predictor of submission of cocaine-negative urine samples and self-reports of cocaine abstinence at the follow-up evaluation, even after controlling for other variables associated with long-term abstinence, such as pretreatment urinalysis results and longest duration of abstinence achieved during treatment. These results suggest that magnitudes of earnings during prize CM may impact outcomes and call for further experimentation of parameters related to the efficacy of prize CM.

摘要

contingency management (CM) 治疗为患者提供了赢得不同大小奖品机会的治疗方法,这种方法越来越受欢迎。在 CM 文献中,强化的幅度与效果大小有关,因此提供更大强化幅度的 CM 治疗比提供较小强化幅度的治疗更有效。在奖品 CM 中,即使总体预期奖品收入的幅度保持不变,一些患者赢得的奖品也多于其他患者。因此,在治疗过程中赢得更多总奖品的患者可能比赢得较少奖品的患者有更好的结果。本研究评估了赢得的总奖品数量对长期戒断结果的影响。通过对 78 名可卡因滥用美沙酮维持治疗患者进行分析,这些患者在三项临床试验中被随机分配到奖品 CM 治疗组,确定了在奖品 CM 治疗期间赢得的奖品金额。CM 干预结束后三个月的戒断是主要的因变量。在 CM 治疗期间赢得的奖品金额是提交可卡因阴性尿液样本和自我报告可卡因戒断的显著预测因子,即使在控制了与长期戒断相关的其他变量后,如预处理尿液分析结果和治疗期间最长的禁欲时间。这些结果表明,奖品 CM 期间的收入幅度可能会影响结果,并呼吁进一步实验与奖品 CM 疗效相关的参数。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验