Suppr超能文献

可卡因成瘾的美沙酮患者中,应急奖励与代金券对比的随机试验。

Randomized trial of contingent prizes versus vouchers in cocaine-using methadone patients.

作者信息

Petry Nancy M, Alessi Sheila M, Hanson Tressa, Sierra Sean

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington, CT 06030, USA.

出版信息

J Consult Clin Psychol. 2007 Dec;75(6):983-91. doi: 10.1037/0022-006X.75.6.983.

Abstract

Contingency management (CM) interventions frequently utilize vouchers as reinforcers, but a prize-based system is also efficacious. This study compared these approaches. Seventy-four cocaine-dependent methadone outpatients were randomly assigned to standard treatment (ST), ST plus a maximum of $585 in contingent vouchers, or ST plus an expected average maximum of $300 in contingent prizes for 12 weeks. CM participants achieved longer durations of abstinence (LDA) than ST participants, and CM conditions did not differ significantly in outcomes or amount of reinforcement earned. Although long-term abstinence did not differ by group, LDA during treatment was the best predictor of abstinence at 9 months. Thus, reinforcement with prizes was similar to voucher CM in promoting LDA, which is associated with posttreatment benefits.

摘要

应急管理(CM)干预措施经常使用代金券作为强化物,但基于奖励的系统也同样有效。本研究对这两种方法进行了比较。74名依赖可卡因的美沙酮门诊患者被随机分配到标准治疗组(ST)、标准治疗加最高585美元的应急代金券组,或标准治疗加预期平均最高300美元的应急奖励组,为期12周。CM组参与者的持续戒断时间(LDA)比ST组参与者更长,且CM组在结果或获得的强化量方面没有显著差异。尽管长期戒断情况在各组之间没有差异,但治疗期间的LDA是9个月时戒断情况的最佳预测指标。因此,奖励强化在促进LDA方面与代金券CM相似,而LDA与治疗后的益处相关。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验