• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

直接挑战试验:哮喘中的气道高反应性:其测量方法及临床意义。

Direct challenge tests: Airway hyperresponsiveness in asthma: its measurement and clinical significance.

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Division of Respirology, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, Royal University Hospital, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada.

出版信息

Chest. 2010 Aug;138(2 Suppl):18S-24S. doi: 10.1378/chest.10-0088.

DOI:10.1378/chest.10-0088
PMID:20668014
Abstract

Direct bronchoprovocation challenges (eg, methacholine), which act directly on a specific airway smooth muscle receptor, are the most commonly performed challenge tests. Cut points have been arbitrarily selected to give high sensitivity and negative predictive values. In subjects with clinically current symptoms (within a few days) who inhale methacholine without deep inhalations, a normal methacholine test (provocative concentration causing a 20% fall in FEV(1) [PC(20)] > 16 mg/mL) rules out (current) asthma with reasonable certainty. A positive test in the moderate or greater range (PC(20) < 1 mg/mL) has high specificity and positive predictive value, comparable to the indirect challenges. Values between these levels are consistent with, but not diagnostic of, asthma. The positive predictive value (for clinical asthma) will increase the closer the PC(20) is to 1 mg/mL, the higher the pretest probability is for asthma and the more the methacholine-induced symptoms resemble the naturally occurring symptoms. Direct challenges are more sensitive and less specific than indirect challenges (exercise, adenosine monophosphate, mannitol, etc).

摘要

直接支气管激发挑战(例如,乙酰甲胆碱)直接作用于特定气道平滑肌受体,是最常进行的挑战测试。切点是任意选择的,以获得高灵敏度和阴性预测值。在有临床当前症状(在几天内)的受试者中,如果他们不进行深呼吸而吸入乙酰甲胆碱,则正常的乙酰甲胆碱测试(引起 FEV1 下降 20%的激发浓度 [PC20] > 16 mg/mL)可以合理确定排除(当前)哮喘。在中度或更高范围内的阳性测试(PC20 < 1 mg/mL)具有高特异性和阳性预测值,与间接挑战相当。在这些水平之间的值与哮喘一致,但不能诊断为哮喘。阳性预测值(对于临床哮喘)将随着 PC20 接近 1 mg/mL 而增加,哮喘的术前概率越高,并且乙酰甲胆碱引起的症状越类似于自然发生的症状。直接挑战比间接挑战(运动、单磷酸腺苷、甘露醇等)更敏感但特异性更低。

相似文献

1
Direct challenge tests: Airway hyperresponsiveness in asthma: its measurement and clinical significance.直接挑战试验:哮喘中的气道高反应性:其测量方法及临床意义。
Chest. 2010 Aug;138(2 Suppl):18S-24S. doi: 10.1378/chest.10-0088.
2
Comparison of percentage fall in FVC at the provocative concentration of methacholine causing a 20% fall in FEV(1) between patients with asymptomatic bronchial hyperresponsiveness and mild asthma.无症状支气管高反应性患者与轻度哮喘患者在引起第一秒用力呼气容积(FEV₁)下降20%的乙酰甲胆碱激发浓度下,用力肺活量(FVC)下降百分比的比较。
Chest. 2007 Jul;132(1):106-11. doi: 10.1378/chest.06-2943. Epub 2007 May 15.
3
Bronchial challenges and respiratory symptoms in elite swimmers and winter sport athletes: Airway hyperresponsiveness in asthma: its measurement and clinical significance.优秀游泳运动员和冬季运动运动员的支气管挑战和呼吸道症状:哮喘中的气道高反应性:其测量方法和临床意义。
Chest. 2010 Aug;138(2 Suppl):31S-37S. doi: 10.1378/chest.09-1689. Epub 2010 Apr 2.
4
Symptom evaluation during the methacholine test: Does it add to the interpretation of the test results based on the PC20FEV1?乙酰甲胆碱试验期间的症状评估:它是否有助于基于PC20FEV1对试验结果的解读?
Clin Respir J. 2018 Apr;12(4):1536-1544. doi: 10.1111/crj.12701. Epub 2017 Sep 18.
5
Small-airway obstruction, dynamic hyperinflation, and gas trapping despite normal airway sensitivity to methacholine in adults with chronic cough.成人慢性咳嗽患者存在小气道阻塞、动态过度充气和气体陷闭,但对乙酰甲胆碱的气道敏感性正常。
J Appl Physiol (1985). 2019 Feb 1;126(2):294-304. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00635.2018. Epub 2018 Sep 20.
6
Comparison of mannitol and methacholine to predict exercise-induced bronchoconstriction and a clinical diagnosis of asthma.甘露醇与乙酰甲胆碱在预测运动诱发的支气管收缩及哮喘临床诊断中的比较。
Respir Res. 2009 Jan 23;10(1):4. doi: 10.1186/1465-9921-10-4.
7
Diagnostic accuracy of methacholine challenge tests assessing airway hyperreactivity in asthmatic patients - a multifunctional approach.评估哮喘患者气道高反应性的乙酰甲胆碱激发试验的诊断准确性——一种多功能方法。
Respir Res. 2016 Nov 17;17(1):154. doi: 10.1186/s12931-016-0470-0.
8
Cut-off points defining normal and asthmatic bronchial reactivity to exercise and inhalation challenges in children and young adults.界定儿童和青年对运动及吸入性激发试验的正常和哮喘性支气管反应性的切点
Eur Respir J. 1999 Sep;14(3):659-68. doi: 10.1034/j.1399-3003.1999.14c28.x.
9
Sputum eosinophil count in a large population of patients with mild to moderate steroid-naive asthma: distribution and relationship with methacholine bronchial hyperresponsiveness.大量轻度至中度未使用过类固醇的哮喘患者痰液嗜酸性粒细胞计数:分布及其与乙酰甲胆碱支气管高反应性的关系
Allergy. 2002 Oct;57(10):907-12. doi: 10.1034/j.1398-9995.2002.23608.x.
10
Mannitol and AMP do not induce bronchoconstriction in eosinophilic bronchitis: further evidence for dissociation between airway inflammation and bronchial hyperresponsiveness.甘露醇和 AMP 不会引起嗜酸性支气管炎的支气管收缩:气道炎症与支气管高反应性分离的进一步证据。
Respirology. 2010 Apr;15(3):510-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1843.2010.01712.x. Epub 2010 Feb 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Oscillometry with or without spirometry for methacholine testing.使用或不使用肺量计进行振荡法乙酰甲胆碱激发试验。
Physiol Rep. 2025 May;13(10):e70387. doi: 10.14814/phy2.70387.
2
Changes in Small Airway Physiology Measured by Impulse Oscillometry in Subjects with Allergic Asthma Following Methacholine and Inhaled Allergen Challenge.在过敏性哮喘患者中,通过脉冲振荡法测量乙酰甲胆碱和吸入变应原激发后小气道生理的变化。
J Clin Med. 2025 Jan 30;14(3):906. doi: 10.3390/jcm14030906.
3
Expert opinion on gray areas in asthma management: A lesson from the innovative project "revolution in asthma" of the Italian thoracic society (AIPO-ITS).
哮喘管理中灰色地带的专家意见:来自意大利胸科学会(AIPO-ITS)“哮喘革命”创新项目的经验教训。
Clin Transl Allergy. 2025 Feb;15(2):e70037. doi: 10.1002/clt2.70037.
4
Oscillometry in Asthma: Respiratory Modeling and Analysis in Occupational and Work-Exacerbated Phenotypes.哮喘中的振荡法:职业性和工作加重型哮喘表型的呼吸建模与分析
J Asthma Allergy. 2024 Oct 11;17:983-1000. doi: 10.2147/JAA.S473639. eCollection 2024.
5
What is the Best Way to Diagnose Possible Asthma Patients with Negative Bronchodilator Reversibility Tests?对于支气管扩张剂可逆性试验结果为阴性的疑似哮喘患者,最佳诊断方法是什么?
J Asthma Allergy. 2024 Feb 22;17:113-122. doi: 10.2147/JAA.S437756. eCollection 2024.
6
Feasibility and value of a domiciliary spirometry programme in the assessment of severe asthma: a real-world evaluation.家庭肺量计计划在重度哮喘评估中的可行性和价值:一项真实世界评估
ERJ Open Res. 2023 Dec 27;9(6). doi: 10.1183/23120541.00635-2023. eCollection 2023 Nov.
7
Occupational asthma related to indoor air pollution in a worker at an indoor air gun shooting range: a case report.一名室内气枪射击场工人因室内空气污染导致的职业性哮喘:病例报告
Ann Occup Environ Med. 2023 Jun 19;35:e13. doi: 10.35371/aoem.2023.35.e13. eCollection 2023.
8
Bronchodilator Response in FEF for the Diagnosis of Asthma in Children.用力呼气流量对于儿童哮喘诊断的支气管扩张剂反应。
Respir Care. 2023 Apr;68(4):505-510. doi: 10.4187/respcare.10177.
9
Subtypes of Adult-Onset Asthma at the Time of Diagnosis: A Latent Class Analysis.成人哮喘诊断时的亚型:潜在类别分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Feb 9;20(4):3072. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20043072.
10
Airway smooth muscle function in asthma.哮喘中的气道平滑肌功能
Front Physiol. 2022 Oct 5;13:993406. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2022.993406. eCollection 2022.