Brédart S
Faculté de Psychologie (B-32), Université de Liège, Belgium.
J Psycholinguist Res. 1991 Mar;20(2):123-38. doi: 10.1007/BF01067879.
Levelt (1983) proposed that the reason why speakers often do not interrupt an erroneous word before self-repairing is a lack of trouble detection before the end of that word. However, this explanation does not apply to merely inappropriate words. According to Levelt, this latter kind of word is completed for pragmatic reasons. In the present paper, a new corpus containing 1225 repairs is analyzed. From Levelt's theoretical framework, it was predicted that for erroneous words the longer the reparandum the higher the amount of word interruptions. Another prediction was that this decrease across word length should be slighter for nonerroneous words than for erroneous ones. Both predictions were confirmed. Results were consistent with Levelt's hypothesis and especially with the idea that erroneous word completion is not a real exception to the main interruption rule in speech self-repairing.
莱尔特（1983年）提出，说话者在自我修正之前往往不会打断错误单词，原因在于在该单词结束之前缺乏问题检测。然而，这种解释不适用于仅仅不恰当的单词。根据莱尔特的观点，后一种单词是出于语用原因而完整说出的。在本文中，对一个包含1225次修正的新语料库进行了分析。从莱尔特的理论框架出发，预测对于错误单词，待修正部分越长，单词打断的次数就越高。另一个预测是，对于非错误单词，这种随着单词长度的减少应该比错误单词更轻微。这两个预测都得到了证实。结果与莱尔特的假设一致，特别是与错误单词的完整说出并非言语自我修正中主要打断规则的真正例外这一观点一致。
